T2
BO3
CS2
2026-05-20
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | CYBERSHOKE Prospects | vs | MASONIC | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
0% (0/1) |
|
45% (27/60) | -45pp |
mirage
|
50% (3/6) |
|
9% (3/32) | +41pp |
ancient
|
73% (8/11) |
|
32% (18/56) | +41pp |
inferno
|
71% (5/7) |
|
39% (15/38) | +32pp |
nuke
|
20% (1/5) |
|
42% (29/69) | -22pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
33% (4/12) | +7pp |
dust2
|
56% (9/16) |
|
53% (9/17) | +3pp |
vertigo
|
— | · | 55% (11/20) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
CYBERSHOKE Prospects bans
nuke
20% WR
anubis
40% WR
MASONIC bans
mirage
9% WR
ancient
32% WR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects pick
inferno
65% — CYBERSHOKE Prospects favored
Decider
overpass
100% MASONIC
Decider
vertigo
MASONIC pick
dust2
49% — MASONIC favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
MASONIC
mirage
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
ancient
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
inferno
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
nuke
MASONIC
anubis
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
dust2
even
CYBERSHOKE Prospects on left ·
MASONIC on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.