Young Ninjas vs Misa — CounterQuant

T2 BO3 CS2 2026-05-20

Young Ninjas

1 : 2

Misa wins

Misa Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Young Ninjas	vs	Misa	Edge
overpass	72% (18/25)		40% (2/5)	+32pp
mirage	54% (27/50)		42% (8/19)	+12pp
nuke	52% (16/31)		40% (6/15)	+12pp
dust2	58% (29/50)		64% (14/22)	-6pp
inferno	33% (4/12)		36% (4/11)	-3pp
anubis	47% (14/30)		50% (4/8)	-3pp
ancient	49% (30/61)	·	—
vertigo	71% (25/35)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Young Ninjas bans

inferno 33% WR

anubis 47% WR

Misa bans

overpass 40% WR

nuke 40% WR

Young Ninjas pick

dust2

48% — Young Ninjas favored

Decider

ancient

Decider

vertigo

Misa pick

mirage

44% — Misa favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

overpass

64%

36%

Young Ninjas

mirage

56%

44%

Young Ninjas

nuke

57%

43%

Young Ninjas

dust2

48%

52%

even

inferno

48%

52%

even

anubis

48%

52%

even

Young Ninjas on left · Misa on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Young Ninjas
MVP rud AWP	74	60	11	24%	94.7	66.3%	1.26	5.9
n0te RIFLER	63	67	17	56%	87.7	66.3%	1.08	5.2
joeski	54	60	14	43%	69.5	72.5%	1.01	—
tein SUPPORT	49	62	23	51%	71.6	76.3%	0.99	4.7
mASKED	45	65	19	38%	67.2	60.0%	0.79	—
Misa WIN
MVP Ckanic RIFLER	64	54	21	61%	86.3	71.3%	1.22	5.3
Zuedsta	63	55	23	49%	84.4	73.8%	1.21	—
Aliot	66	57	21	39%	84.0	71.3%	1.21	—
Mertowsk1	61	52	17	36%	82.8	73.8%	1.20	—
rim3 RIFLER	56	65	21	45%	81.8	66.3%	1.01	6.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Young Ninjas
tein	20	19	7	60%	96.4	91.3%	1.38	4.7
rud	23	19	6	35%	88.5	78.3%	1.37	5.9
n0te	15	19	5	47%	66.2	65.2%	0.89	5.2
joeski	11	16	5	27%	57.2	78.3%	0.88	—
mASKED	14	19	4	36%	64.0	52.2%	0.75	—
Misa WIN
Ckanic	30	14	5	57%	126.4	82.6%	1.89	5.3
Aliot	20	17	7	40%	86.6	65.2%	1.20	—
RIM3	18	18	6	39%	90.7	69.6%	1.15	6.2
Zuedsta	15	16	4	47%	67.6	69.6%	1.00	—
Mertowsk1	9	18	5	44%	44.6	60.9%	0.59	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Young Ninjas WIN
rud	37	24	3	27%	105.9	71.4%	1.48	5.9
n0te	31	26	7	61%	103.6	62.9%	1.24	5.2
joeski	28	27	5	50%	77.4	65.7%	1.08	—
mASKED	23	28	9	43%	75.0	65.7%	0.95	—
tein	15	25	10	60%	61.8	74.3%	0.82	4.7
Misa
Aliot	29	25	5	41%	81.6	68.6%	1.17	—
Mertowsk1	26	26	9	42%	95.6	71.4%	1.16	—
Zuedsta	27	25	4	59%	82.1	68.6%	1.12	—
RIM3	27	30	5	52%	85.5	62.9%	1.02	6.2
Ckanic	16	25	11	69%	60.8	54.3%	0.70	5.3

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Young Ninjas
joeski	15	17	4	40%	69.8	77.3%	1.05	—
n0te	17	22	5	53%	84.8	72.7%	1.02	5.2
tein	14	18	6	29%	61.3	63.6%	0.86	4.7
rud	14	17	2	0%	83.3	45.5%	0.81	5.9
mASKED	8	18	6	25%	58.2	59.1%	0.59	—
Misa WIN
Mertowsk1	26	8	3	27%	102.3	90.9%	1.89	—
Zuedsta	21	14	15	38%	105.7	86.4%	1.58	—
Ckanic	18	15	5	61%	85.0	86.4%	1.33	5.3
Aliot	17	15	9	35%	85.2	81.8%	1.28	—
RIM3	11	17	10	36%	66.5	68.2%	0.84	6.2

Teams

Players in this match

rud Ckanic Zuedsta Aliot Mertowsk1 n0te joeski rim3 tein mASKED