Gentle Mates vs Eternal Fire

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-30

Gentle Mates Winner

2 : 1

Gentle Mates wins

Eternal Fire

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Gentle Mates	vs	Eternal Fire	Edge
mirage	31% (9/29)		52% (63/121)	-21pp
ancient	68% (25/37)		48% (14/29)	+20pp
inferno	72% (26/36)		58% (63/108)	+14pp
anubis	70% (7/10)		68% (58/85)	+2pp
nuke	57% (21/37)		58% (58/100)	-1pp
overpass	57% (8/14)		56% (42/75)	+1pp
dust2	—	·	53% (60/114)
vertigo	—	·	67% (36/54)

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Gentle Mates bans

mirage 31% WR

nuke 57% WR

Eternal Fire bans

ancient 48% WR

overpass 56% WR

Gentle Mates pick

inferno

55% — Gentle Mates favored

Decider

dust2

Decider

vertigo

Eternal Fire pick

anubis

49% — Eternal Fire favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

mirage

37%

63%

Eternal Fire

ancient

59%

41%

Gentle Mates

inferno

55%

45%

Gentle Mates

anubis

51%

49%

even

nuke

50%

even

overpass

50%

even

Gentle Mates on left · Eternal Fire on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gentle Mates WIN
MVP MartinezSa	90	69	13	29%	88.6	62.3%	1.20	—
sausoL	79	72	24	58%	91.1	70.8%	1.17	—
dav1g	74	78	23	49%	83.8	65.1%	1.04	—
mopoz RIFLER	65	78	21	62%	70.9	65.1%	0.92	8.6
alex	64	76	27	38%	74.4	61.3%	0.91	—
Eternal Fire
MVP jottAAA	83	69	21	57%	91.9	69.8%	1.22	—
regali	80	70	22	25%	85.7	66.0%	1.14	—
MisteM ENTRY	71	76	23	61%	81.6	60.4%	0.98	5.6
DemQQ	63	79	30	59%	79.8	67.0%	0.95	—
rigoN	69	78	12	46%	73.2	60.4%	0.92	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gentle Mates WIN
MartinezSa	62	44	8	24%	96.9	65.7%	1.31	—
sausoL	50	45	19	62%	95.6	73.1%	1.22	—
dav1g	47	47	17	55%	89.5	67.2%	1.10	—
alex	46	47	18	39%	83.0	67.2%	1.06	—
mopoz	40	48	13	57%	65.4	62.7%	0.88	8.6
Eternal Fire
regali	54	45	12	19%	87.9	65.7%	1.18	—
jottAAA	53	47	13	55%	87.9	67.2%	1.16	—
mistem	48	50	17	60%	88.3	59.7%	1.03	5.6
rigoN	42	52	10	38%	75.2	58.2%	0.87	—
DemQQ	31	52	19	58%	69.6	65.7%	0.78	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gentle Mates WIN
sausoL	18	11	4	56%	91.9	77.3%	1.38	—
dav1g	21	15	4	29%	87.6	72.7%	1.35	—
MartinezSa	20	13	4	40%	87.9	68.2%	1.33	—
mopoz	16	15	4	56%	85.3	77.3%	1.18	8.6
alex	14	14	8	29%	78.8	72.7%	1.09	—
Eternal Fire
regali	17	16	3	47%	93.2	59.1%	1.09	—
jottAAA	15	17	5	67%	92.9	59.1%	0.99	—
DemQQ	11	18	7	45%	69.2	54.6%	0.71	—
mistem	11	16	2	55%	53.9	54.6%	0.69	5.6
rigoN	10	20	2	60%	51.9	50.0%	0.51	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gentle Mates
sausoL	11	16	1	45%	72.7	52.9%	0.74	—
mopoz	9	15	4	89%	74.2	58.8%	0.74	8.6
MartinezSa	8	12	1	38%	57.1	41.2%	0.58	—
dav1g	6	16	2	67%	56.4	47.1%	0.40	—
alex	4	15	1	50%	35.0	23.5%	0.08	—
Eternal Fire WIN
DemQQ	21	9	4	67%	133.6	88.2%	1.94	—
jottAAA	15	5	3	53%	106.5	94.1%	1.71	—
rigoN	17	6	0	59%	92.9	82.4%	1.64	—
mistem	12	10	4	67%	91.1	70.6%	1.19	5.6
regali	9	9	7	22%	67.2	76.5%	1.05	—

Teams

Players in this match

jottAAA MartinezSa sausoL regali dav1g MisteM DemQQ mopoz rigoN alex