Lavked vs ex-Zero Tenacity

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-20

Lavked Winner

2 : 1

Lavked wins

ex-Zero Tenacity

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Lavked	vs	ex-Zero Tenacity	Edge
inferno	25% (2/8)		54% (19/35)	-29pp
mirage	61% (22/36)		35% (11/31)	+26pp
nuke	64% (18/28)		50% (21/42)	+14pp
dust2	58% (11/19)		48% (21/44)	+10pp
anubis	50% (5/10)		43% (6/14)	+7pp
overpass	33% (2/6)		30% (6/20)	+3pp
ancient	92% (11/12)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Lavked bans

inferno 25% WR

anubis 50% WR

ex-Zero Tenacity bans

overpass 30% WR

mirage 35% WR

Lavked pick

nuke

56% — Lavked favored

Decider

ancient

Decider

vertigo

ex-Zero Tenacity pick

dust2

45% — ex-Zero Tenacity favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

32%

68%

ex-Zero Tenacity

mirage

64%

36%

Lavked

nuke

56%

44%

Lavked

dust2

55%

45%

Lavked

anubis

54%

46%

even

overpass

52%

48%

even

Lavked on left · ex-Zero Tenacity on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lavked WIN
MVP Djon8 RIFLER	60	51	22	53%	93.0	72.4%	1.24	7.6
xm1nd AWP	55	45	18	33%	79.7	75.0%	1.20	8.0
sol RIFLER	57	52	10	46%	70.1	68.4%	1.08	7.4
1NVISIBLEE ENTRY	55	61	12	40%	69.6	63.2%	0.96	6.8
k4nfuz RIFLER	43	50	16	67%	61.9	63.2%	0.88	7.3
ex-Zero Tenacity
MVP Kind0 RIFLER	59	53	19	46%	87.5	71.1%	1.18	5.2
Cjoffo RIFLER	58	49	12	62%	74.0	69.7%	1.14	5.5
brutmonster AWP	48	50	14	23%	65.9	63.2%	0.95	5.2
emi SUPPORT	44	60	26	43%	72.1	67.1%	0.90	3.5
aVN RIFLER	45	56	17	40%	64.1	59.2%	0.84	4.1

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lavked
djon8	23	27	13	52%	100.1	70.6%	1.10	7.6
SoLb	24	25	3	58%	68.0	67.7%	1.00	7.4
xm1nd	22	22	9	23%	76.6	61.8%	1.00	8.0
1NVISIBLEE	21	29	6	29%	55.4	52.9%	0.72	6.8
k4nfuz-	14	23	6	86%	44.7	50.0%	0.58	7.3
ex-Zero Tenacity WIN
Kind0	30	21	12	40%	100.8	79.4%	1.43	5.2
Cjoffo	28	18	6	64%	78.7	76.5%	1.32	5.5
brutmonster	26	21	6	23%	71.4	70.6%	1.16	5.2
avntb	24	20	5	46%	65.7	64.7%	1.06	4.1
emiiii	19	27	17	53%	79.7	79.4%	1.01	3.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lavked
djon8	21	11	6	48%	100.3	80.0%	1.61	7.6
xm1nd	13	10	5	38%	67.1	90.0%	1.25	8.0
k4nfuz-	15	13	3	67%	72.9	75.0%	1.16	7.3
SoLb	15	14	5	27%	65.9	70.0%	1.08	7.4
1NVISIBLEE	15	18	4	47%	77.4	70.0%	1.01	6.8
ex-Zero Tenacity
Cjoffo	13	14	5	69%	64.5	75.0%	1.03	5.5
Kind0	14	15	2	50%	72.1	60.0%	0.95	5.2
brutmonster	12	15	6	17%	73.2	65.0%	0.92	5.2
emiiii	13	16	5	46%	73.1	60.0%	0.89	3.5
avntb	11	16	4	27%	58.2	55.0%	0.72	4.1

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lavked
xm1nd	20	13	4	40%	95.8	81.8%	1.45	8.0
1NVISIBLEE	19	14	2	47%	84.4	72.7%	1.28	6.8
SoLb	18	13	2	44%	77.1	68.2%	1.21	7.4
djon8	16	13	3	63%	75.4	68.2%	1.13	7.6
k4nfuz-	14	14	7	50%	78.6	72.7%	1.09	7.3
ex-Zero Tenacity
Kind0	15	17	5	53%	81.1	68.2%	1.02	5.2
Cjoffo	17	17	1	53%	75.1	54.6%	0.96	5.5
emiiii	12	17	4	25%	59.7	54.6%	0.73	3.5
brutmonster	10	14	2	30%	50.8	50.0%	0.65	5.2
avntb	10	20	8	40%	67.2	54.6%	0.62	4.1

Teams

Players in this match

Djon8 xm1nd Kind0 Cjoffo sol 1NVISIBLEE brutmonster emi k4nfuz aVN