CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | fnatic | vs | BRUTE | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
48% (31/64) |
|
29% (9/31) | +19pp |
inferno
|
62% (71/114) |
|
44% (16/36) | +18pp |
nuke
|
52% (22/42) |
|
36% (5/14) | +16pp |
ancient
|
54% (83/153) |
|
47% (14/30) | +7pp |
mirage
|
46% (50/109) |
|
40% (14/35) | +6pp |
overpass
|
56% (40/71) |
|
50% (7/14) | +6pp |
anubis
|
45% (33/74) |
|
44% (7/16) | +1pp |
vertigo
|
53% (31/58) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
fnatic bans
anubis
45% WR
mirage
46% WR
BRUTE bans
dust2
29% WR
nuke
36% WR
fnatic pick
inferno
58% — fnatic favored
Decider
ancient
53% fnatic
Decider
vertigo
BRUTE pick
overpass
47% — BRUTE favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
fnatic
inferno
fnatic
nuke
fnatic
ancient
even
mirage
even
overpass
even
anubis
even
fnatic on left ·
BRUTE on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.