T2
BO3
CS2
2026-05-24
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Bounty Hunters | vs | LP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
50% (56/112) |
|
76% (26/34) | -26pp |
dust2
|
49% (47/96) |
|
66% (27/41) | -17pp |
inferno
|
54% (15/28) |
|
67% (30/45) | -13pp |
mirage
|
57% (63/110) |
|
48% (15/31) | +9pp |
ancient
|
57% (50/87) |
|
64% (21/33) | -7pp |
overpass
|
56% (5/9) |
|
62% (5/8) | -6pp |
anubis
|
38% (16/42) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
0% (0/2) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Bounty Hunters bans
dust2
49% WR
nuke
50% WR
LP bans
mirage
48% WR
overpass
62% WR
Bounty Hunters pick
ancient
47% — Bounty Hunters favored
Decider
anubis
Decider
vertigo
LP pick
inferno
55% — LP favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
LP
dust2
LP
inferno
LP
mirage
even
ancient
even
overpass
even
Bounty Hunters on left ·
LP on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.