T2
BO3
CS2
2026-05-22
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Bounty Hunters | vs | MIBR Academy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
54% (15/28) |
|
29% (2/7) | +25pp |
overpass
|
56% (5/9) |
|
34% (10/29) | +22pp |
vertigo
|
0% (0/2) |
|
22% (2/9) | -22pp |
ancient
|
57% (50/87) |
|
40% (19/48) | +17pp |
mirage
|
57% (63/110) |
|
44% (24/55) | +13pp |
nuke
|
50% (56/112) |
|
37% (23/62) | +13pp |
anubis
|
38% (16/42) |
|
51% (20/39) | -13pp |
dust2
|
49% (47/96) |
|
41% (13/32) | +8pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Bounty Hunters bans
anubis
38% WR
dust2
49% WR
MIBR Academy bans
inferno
29% WR
overpass
34% WR
Bounty Hunters pick
mirage
56% — Bounty Hunters favored
Decider
nuke
57% Bounty Hunters
Decider
vertigo
100% MIBR Academy
MIBR Academy pick
ancient
41% — MIBR Academy favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
Bounty Hunters
overpass
Bounty Hunters
vertigo
MIBR Academy
ancient
Bounty Hunters
mirage
Bounty Hunters
nuke
Bounty Hunters
anubis
MIBR Academy
dust2
even
Bounty Hunters on left ·
MIBR Academy on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.