CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Isurus | vs | Procyon | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
0% (0/1) |
|
100% (2/2) | -100pp |
ancient
|
60% (6/10) |
|
25% (2/8) | +35pp |
inferno
|
67% (16/24) |
|
46% (13/28) | +21pp |
overpass
|
46% (6/13) |
|
25% (2/8) | +21pp |
mirage
|
46% (6/13) |
|
33% (5/15) | +13pp |
nuke
|
33% (7/21) |
|
45% (10/22) | -12pp |
dust2
|
56% (18/32) |
|
49% (17/35) | +7pp |
vertigo
|
— | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Isurus bans
nuke
33% WR
overpass
46% WR
Procyon bans
ancient
25% WR
mirage
33% WR
Isurus pick
inferno
59% — Isurus favored
Decider
anubis
100% Procyon
Decider
vertigo
Procyon pick
dust2
47% — Procyon favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
Procyon
ancient
Isurus
inferno
Isurus
overpass
Isurus
mirage
Isurus
nuke
Procyon
dust2
even
Isurus on left ·
Procyon on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.