T2
BO3
CS2
2026-05-20
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR Academy | vs | R2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
51% (20/39) |
|
33% (2/6) | +18pp |
nuke
|
37% (23/62) |
|
47% (15/32) | -10pp |
overpass
|
34% (10/29) |
|
44% (7/16) | -10pp |
inferno
|
29% (2/7) |
|
37% (7/19) | -8pp |
ancient
|
40% (19/48) |
|
33% (3/9) | +7pp |
dust2
|
41% (13/32) |
|
38% (10/26) | +3pp |
mirage
|
44% (24/55) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
22% (2/9) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR Academy bans
inferno
29% WR
overpass
34% WR
R2 bans
anubis
33% WR
ancient
33% WR
MIBR Academy pick
dust2
52% — MIBR Academy favored
Decider
mirage
Decider
vertigo
R2 pick
nuke
56% — R2 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
MIBR Academy
nuke
R2
overpass
R2
inferno
R2
ancient
MIBR Academy
dust2
even
MIBR Academy on left ·
R2 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.