CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | FaZe | vs | Sharks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
52% (33/64) |
|
75% (6/8) | -23pp |
anubis
|
51% (27/53) |
|
70% (81/116) | -19pp |
vertigo
|
44% (4/9) |
|
55% (42/77) | -11pp |
mirage
|
57% (63/110) |
|
50% (66/133) | +7pp |
nuke
|
62% (72/116) |
|
57% (114/199) | +5pp |
inferno
|
57% (50/88) |
|
56% (67/120) | +1pp |
ancient
|
64% (69/108) |
|
64% (82/128) | 0pp |
overpass
|
42% (21/50) |
|
42% (10/24) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
FaZe bans
overpass
42% WR
vertigo
44% WR
Sharks bans
mirage
50% WR
inferno
56% WR
FaZe pick
ancient
50% — FaZe favored
Decider
nuke
52% FaZe
Decider
anubis
58% Sharks
Sharks pick
dust2
59% — Sharks favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
Sharks
anubis
Sharks
vertigo
Sharks
mirage
even
nuke
even
inferno
even
ancient
even
overpass
even
FaZe on left ·
Sharks on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side