CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Alliance | vs | Sharks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
47% (39/83) |
|
75% (6/8) | -28pp |
vertigo
|
37% (14/38) |
|
55% (42/77) | -18pp |
anubis
|
57% (54/94) |
|
70% (81/116) | -13pp |
overpass
|
54% (30/56) |
|
42% (10/24) | +12pp |
inferno
|
65% (101/156) |
|
56% (67/120) | +9pp |
ancient
|
55% (72/131) |
|
64% (82/128) | -9pp |
mirage
|
43% (20/46) |
|
50% (66/133) | -7pp |
nuke
|
52% (43/83) |
|
57% (114/199) | -5pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Alliance bans
vertigo
37% WR
mirage
43% WR
Sharks bans
overpass
42% WR
inferno
56% WR
Alliance pick
anubis
45% — Alliance favored
Decider
nuke
52% Sharks
Decider
ancient
54% Sharks
Sharks pick
dust2
61% — Sharks favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
Sharks
vertigo
Sharks
anubis
Sharks
overpass
Alliance
inferno
even
ancient
even
mirage
even
nuke
even
Alliance on left ·
Sharks on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side