MIBR vs B8 — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-22

MIBR Winner

2 : 1

MIBR wins

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	MIBR	B8	Edge
mirage	47% (43/91)	62% (121/195)	-15pp
inferno	66% (63/96)	51% (43/84)	+15pp
dust2	38% (3/8)	52% (34/66)	-14pp
anubis	63% (69/109)	53% (49/92)	+10pp
vertigo	60% (49/82)	52% (15/29)	+8pp
ancient	65% (72/111)	59% (94/159)	+6pp
overpass	47% (14/30)	41% (7/17)	+6pp
nuke	59% (72/122)	55% (45/82)	+4pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

MIBR bans

dust2 38% WR

mirage 47% WR

B8 bans

overpass 41% WR

inferno 51% WR

MIBR pick

ancient

52% — MIBR favored

Decider

anubis

54% MIBR

Decider

vertigo

54% MIBR

B8 pick

nuke

48% — B8 favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

mirage

43%

57%

inferno

56%

44%

MIBR

dust2

42%

58%

anubis

54%

46%

even

vertigo

54%

46%

even

ancient

52%

48%

even

overpass

53%

47%

even

nuke

52%

48%

even

MIBR on left · B8 on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR WIN
MVP insani RIFLER	59	33	10	59%	109.3	78.6%	1.60	9.3
LNZ SUPPORT	49	29	12	59%	81.3	80.4%	1.41	8.9
venomzera RIFLER	42	39	17	60%	89.3	75.0%	1.20	9.0
kl1m RIFLER	35	29	17	34%	77.0	80.4%	1.19	9.4
brnz4n RIFLER	30	33	14	70%	59.4	66.1%	0.91	8.9
B8
MVP alex666 RIFLER	39	40	12	51%	78.1	67.9%	1.05	9.4
esenthial RIFLER	28	38	11	57%	58.6	73.2%	0.87	9.4
kensizor ENTRY	28	45	15	57%	59.8	67.9%	0.78	9.4
s1zzi	31	43	9	39%	63.9	57.1%	0.77	—
npl RIFLER	31	46	11	48%	70.5	51.8%	0.73	9.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR
LNZ	19	14	4	63%	71.8	80.0%	1.25	8.9
kl1m	19	17	7	21%	90.0	76.0%	1.23	9.4
insani	19	19	4	53%	74.9	64.0%	1.04	9.3
venomzera	16	21	6	56%	74.4	68.0%	0.93	9.0
brnz4n	13	18	8	62%	55.3	64.0%	0.80	8.9
B8 WIN
s1zzi	20	18	7	35%	89.4	72.0%	1.21	—
alex666	18	17	6	61%	83.0	76.0%	1.17	9.4
npl	21	18	4	43%	82.5	64.0%	1.15	9.5
esenthial	13	13	7	62%	65.6	84.0%	1.09	9.4
kensizor	14	18	10	50%	62.4	76.0%	0.96	9.4

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR WIN
venomzera	16	8	7	75%	131.5	86.7%	1.80	9.0
insani	15	6	3	67%	113.5	80.0%	1.68	9.3
LNZ	10	8	4	60%	74.9	73.3%	1.16	8.9
brnz4n	10	7	1	80%	70.5	66.7%	1.11	8.9
kl1m	7	6	4	57%	58.9	80.0%	1.05	9.4
B8
esenthial	9	12	1	56%	60.9	66.7%	0.84	9.4
alex666	7	10	4	29%	52.0	53.3%	0.69	9.4
kensizor	7	12	1	86%	56.0	53.3%	0.61	9.4
npl	6	12	5	67%	69.9	46.7%	0.58	9.5
s1zzi	5	12	2	80%	46.7	46.7%	0.43	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR WIN
insani	25	8	3	60%	159.1	100.0%	2.40	9.3
LNZ	20	7	4	55%	102.1	87.5%	1.90	8.9
kl1m	9	6	6	44%	73.6	87.5%	1.26	9.4
venomzera	10	10	4	40%	73.2	75.0%	1.08	9.0
brnz4n	7	8	5	71%	55.4	68.8%	0.88	8.9
B8
alex666	14	13	2	50%	95.1	68.8%	1.20	9.4
kensizor	7	15	4	43%	59.3	68.8%	0.66	9.4
esenthial	6	13	3	50%	45.3	62.5%	0.57	9.4
s1zzi	6	13	0	17%	40.4	43.8%	0.40	—
npl	4	16	2	50%	52.2	37.5%	0.20	9.5

Teams

MIBR

View team →

Players in this match

insani LNZ venomzera kl1m alex666 brnz4n esenthial kensizor s1zzi npl