PARIVISION vs Lynn Vision

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

PARIVISION Winner

2 : 0

PARIVISION wins

Lynn Vision

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	PARIVISION	vs	Lynn Vision	Edge
overpass	38% (8/21)		62% (20/32)	-24pp
vertigo	33% (7/21)		46% (6/13)	-13pp
anubis	47% (30/64)		56% (39/70)	-9pp
nuke	41% (12/29)		49% (38/78)	-8pp
inferno	62% (34/55)		54% (41/76)	+8pp
dust2	74% (74/100)		70% (61/87)	+4pp
ancient	59% (78/133)		58% (48/83)	+1pp
mirage	55% (77/139)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

PARIVISION bans

vertigo 33% WR

overpass 38% WR

Lynn Vision bans

nuke 49% WR

inferno 54% WR

PARIVISION pick

dust2

51% — PARIVISION favored

Decider

mirage

Decider

anubis

54% Lynn Vision

Lynn Vision pick

ancient

50% — Lynn Vision favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

overpass

38%

62%

Lynn Vision

vertigo

42%

58%

Lynn Vision

anubis

46%

54%

even

nuke

46%

54%

even

inferno

53%

47%

even

dust2

51%

49%

even

ancient

50%

even

PARIVISION on left · Lynn Vision on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PARIVISION WIN
MVP nota SUPPORT	31	26	13	65%	76.2	74.5%	1.15	9.5
Jame AWP	27	20	14	22%	68.6	74.5%	1.12	9.8
zweih RIFLER	31	20	4	58%	64.4	68.1%	1.12	9.7
xiELO ENTRY	30	28	5	63%	64.9	59.6%	0.95	9.5
BELCHONOKK RIFLER	18	30	5	50%	52.6	61.7%	0.68	9.6
Lynn Vision
MVP Starry RIFLER	30	28	11	60%	77.6	76.6%	1.13	8.8
C4LLM3SU3 RIFLER	24	25	6	58%	57.0	72.3%	0.94	7.9
z4KR AWP	25	25	10	28%	65.4	61.7%	0.92	9.2
EmiliaQAQ RIFLER	26	29	5	81%	63.7	57.5%	0.85	8.7
westmelon	19	30	11	47%	44.9	57.5%	0.66	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PARIVISION WIN
Jame	13	9	10	15%	67.7	78.3%	1.17	9.8
xiELO	16	11	3	63%	70.1	65.2%	1.12	9.5
BELCHONOKK	13	11	2	46%	71.4	78.3%	1.10	9.6
zweih	13	9	1	46%	48.5	78.3%	1.07	9.7
nota	11	12	6	64%	57.6	78.3%	0.98	9.5
Lynn Vision
C4LLM3SU3	14	12	4	71%	74.1	73.9%	1.10	7.9
z4kr	14	12	3	21%	69.4	56.5%	0.96	9.2
Starry	10	15	6	60%	53.5	65.2%	0.76	8.8
EmiliaQAQ	9	13	2	78%	49.9	60.9%	0.71	8.7
westmelon	5	14	3	40%	33.9	52.2%	0.43	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PARIVISION WIN
nota	20	14	7	65%	94.0	70.8%	1.32	9.5
zweih	18	11	3	67%	79.7	58.3%	1.16	9.7
Jame	14	11	4	29%	69.5	70.8%	1.08	9.8
xiELO	14	17	2	64%	59.8	54.2%	0.78	9.5
BELCHONOKK	5	19	3	60%	34.7	45.8%	0.28	9.6
Lynn Vision
Starry	20	13	5	60%	100.7	87.5%	1.48	8.8
EmiliaQAQ	17	16	3	82%	77.0	54.2%	0.97	8.7
z4kr	11	13	7	36%	61.6	66.7%	0.88	9.2
westmelon	14	16	8	50%	55.3	62.5%	0.88	—
C4LLM3SU3	10	13	2	40%	40.6	70.8%	0.79	7.9

Teams

Players in this match

nota Starry Jame zweih xiELO C4LLM3SU3 z4KR EmiliaQAQ BELCHONOKK westmelon