TYLOO vs paiN — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

TYLOO

1 : 2

paiN wins

paiN Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	paiN	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)	51% (38/74)	-51pp
overpass	51% (20/39)	34% (12/35)	+17pp
ancient	50% (37/74)	39% (9/23)	+11pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)	66% (59/90)	-11pp
mirage	70% (57/82)	62% (75/121)	+8pp
nuke	60% (40/67)	67% (112/167)	-7pp
inferno	56% (60/108)	49% (48/97)	+7pp
anubis	67% (36/54)	64% (75/118)	+3pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

vertigo 55% WR

paiN bans

overpass 34% WR

inferno 49% WR

TYLOO pick

mirage

53% — TYLOO favored

Decider

anubis

51% TYLOO

Decider

dust2

100% paiN

paiN pick

nuke

53% — paiN favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

paiN

overpass

60%

40%

TYLOO

ancient

56%

44%

TYLOO

vertigo

45%

55%

paiN

mirage

53%

47%

even

nuke

47%

53%

even

inferno

53%

47%

even

anubis

51%

49%

even

TYLOO on left · paiN on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
MVP Mercury RIFLER	41	46	15	61%	85.1	70.5%	1.05	9.1
Jee AWP	34	35	15	41%	66.0	62.3%	0.93	9.3
Zero	35	43	9	57%	70.4	65.6%	0.90	—
Moseyuh RIFLER	37	44	11	57%	68.4	59.0%	0.87	9.1
JamYoung RIFLER	37	44	7	62%	70.3	54.1%	0.83	9.1
paiN WIN
MVP snow RIFLER	51	36	13	63%	91.9	72.1%	1.31	9.2
V$m	46	37	12	65%	88.3	75.4%	1.24	—
biguzera ENTRY	43	39	11	53%	78.5	65.6%	1.08	9.0
saffee AWP	38	32	10	29%	69.1	67.2%	1.05	9.0
piriajr RIFLER	30	41	15	53%	62.4	62.3%	0.81	9.3

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
JamYoung	20	14	2	55%	93.3	72.7%	1.35	9.1
Moseyuh	17	14	4	47%	86.6	77.3%	1.25	9.1
Jee	16	8	3	31%	75.1	68.2%	1.25	9.3
Mercury	16	13	7	56%	86.5	77.3%	1.25	9.1
Zero	11	11	6	55%	66.3	72.7%	1.00	—
paiN
V$m	16	15	1	75%	83.9	59.1%	1.03	—
snow	13	16	4	77%	74.8	59.1%	0.87	9.2
biguzera	13	16	2	54%	65.7	54.6%	0.80	9.0
saffee	9	16	5	56%	55.6	59.1%	0.66	9.0
piriajr	7	18	4	43%	49.2	40.9%	0.38	9.3

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
Mercury	15	17	3	47%	89.5	65.0%	1.03	9.1
Moseyuh	12	14	3	67%	60.2	50.0%	0.78	9.1
Jee	8	14	10	75%	51.3	55.0%	0.65	9.3
Zero	9	16	1	56%	50.4	60.0%	0.63	—
JamYoung	9	15	3	56%	57.8	45.0%	0.58	9.1
paiN
snow	17	10	5	59%	90.2	70.0%	1.35	9.2
saffee	15	7	1	33%	76.8	70.0%	1.29	9.0
biguzera	14	10	5	71%	84.8	80.0%	1.28	9.0
piriajr	17	13	4	59%	91.3	70.0%	1.27	9.3
V$m	12	13	6	50%	78.1	85.0%	1.13	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
Zero	15	16	2	60%	96.4	63.2%	1.08	—
Jee	10	13	2	30%	70.8	63.2%	0.85	9.3
Mercury	10	16	5	90%	78.9	68.4%	0.85	9.1
Moseyuh	8	16	4	63%	56.0	47.4%	0.52	9.1
JamYoung	8	15	2	88%	56.7	42.1%	0.50	9.1
paiN
snow	21	10	4	57%	113.6	89.5%	1.77	9.2
V$m	18	9	5	67%	104.0	84.2%	1.60	—
saffee	14	9	4	7%	76.6	73.7%	1.25	9.0
biguzera	16	13	4	38%	86.6	63.2%	1.18	9.0
piriajr	6	10	7	50%	47.2	79.0%	0.82	9.3

Teams

Players in this match

snow V$m biguzera Mercury saffee Jee Zero Moseyuh JamYoung piriajr