M80 vs MOUZ — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

M80

1 : 2

MOUZ wins

MOUZ Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	M80	vs	MOUZ	Edge
vertigo	69% (29/42)		53% (23/43)	+16pp
mirage	71% (64/90)		56% (70/124)	+15pp
nuke	47% (8/17)		61% (66/108)	-14pp
ancient	72% (87/120)		60% (49/81)	+12pp
dust2	56% (35/63)		47% (28/60)	+9pp
overpass	69% (29/42)		66% (31/47)	+3pp
inferno	60% (50/83)		62% (68/110)	-2pp
anubis	59% (38/64)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

M80 bans

nuke 47% WR

inferno 60% WR

MOUZ bans

dust2 47% WR

vertigo 53% WR

M80 pick

ancient

55% — M80 favored

Decider

mirage

56% M80

Decider

anubis

MOUZ pick

overpass

49% — MOUZ favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

vertigo

57%

43%

M80

mirage

56%

44%

M80

nuke

44%

56%

MOUZ

ancient

55%

45%

M80

dust2

54%

46%

even

overpass

51%

49%

even

inferno

49%

51%

even

M80 on left · MOUZ on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M80
MVP s1n SUPPORT	27	40	7	63%	55.1	61.4%	0.73	9.4
Swisher SUPPORT	30	41	12	33%	57.3	54.4%	0.73	9.5
slaxz- AWP	27	42	6	56%	57.1	56.1%	0.68	9.5
Lake RIFLER	32	48	8	66%	67.1	47.4%	0.67	9.3
JBa RIFLER	20	44	5	60%	41.7	42.1%	0.40	9.4
MOUZ WIN
MVP xertioN RIFLER	59	23	13	47%	103.5	82.5%	1.70	9.8
Spinx RIFLER	41	26	12	61%	82.2	82.5%	1.33	9.8
xelex RIFLER	44	28	10	70%	79.4	79.0%	1.32	9.5
torzsi AWP	39	29	10	36%	69.8	77.2%	1.19	9.9
jL SUPPORT	32	30	21	66%	72.4	80.7%	1.12	9.7

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M80
Swisher	8	13	4	38%	52.4	64.7%	0.72	9.5
s1n	6	14	1	83%	57.9	52.9%	0.51	9.4
Lake	8	14	1	63%	48.8	41.2%	0.49	9.3
JBa	8	15	1	50%	55.1	35.3%	0.44	9.4
slaxz-	5	14	2	60%	38.7	47.1%	0.36	9.5
MOUZ WIN
xertioN	23	6	5	39%	116.4	88.2%	2.09	9.8
xelex	19	8	3	68%	114.4	88.2%	1.80	9.5
torzsi	13	6	1	62%	75.8	88.2%	1.43	9.9
Spinx	8	6	6	75%	68.5	88.2%	1.18	9.8
jL	7	9	8	57%	56.2	88.2%	1.01	9.7

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M80
Swisher	9	13	0	44%	58.9	43.8%	0.62	9.5
s1n	8	14	0	88%	56.7	50.0%	0.57	9.4
slaxz-	6	16	1	50%	53.2	37.5%	0.30	9.5
JBa	5	14	1	80%	41.4	31.3%	0.23	9.4
Lake	2	15	0	100%	22.3	18.8%	0.00	9.3
MOUZ WIN
jL	16	7	5	50%	124.3	87.5%	1.76	9.7
Spinx	16	5	1	50%	93.2	87.5%	1.70	9.8
torzsi	18	8	3	17%	109.1	75.0%	1.68	9.9
xertioN	13	4	4	54%	93.1	93.8%	1.64	9.8
xelex	9	6	4	78%	63.4	87.5%	1.21	9.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M80
Lake	22	19	7	64%	110.0	70.8%	1.33	9.3
slaxz-	16	12	3	56%	72.7	75.0%	1.16	9.5
s1n	13	12	6	38%	52.1	75.0%	1.00	9.4
Swisher	13	15	8	23%	59.6	54.2%	0.82	9.5
JBa	7	15	3	57%	32.5	54.2%	0.49	9.4
MOUZ
xertioN	23	13	4	52%	101.4	70.8%	1.46	9.8
Spinx	17	15	5	65%	84.5	75.0%	1.18	9.8
xelex	16	14	3	69%	65.4	66.7%	1.04	9.5
jL	9	14	8	100%	49.2	70.8%	0.78	9.7
torzsi	8	15	6	38%	39.3	70.8%	0.68	9.9

Teams

Players in this match

xertioN Spinx xelex torzsi jL s1n Swisher slaxz- Lake JBa