Lynn Vision vs Ninjas in Pyjamas

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

Lynn Vision Winner

2 : 1

Lynn Vision wins

Ninjas in Pyjamas

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Lynn Vision	vs	Ninjas in Pyjamas	Edge
dust2	70% (61/87)		38% (20/53)	+32pp
overpass	62% (20/32)		40% (20/50)	+22pp
inferno	54% (41/76)		42% (22/53)	+12pp
nuke	49% (38/78)		60% (71/118)	-11pp
anubis	56% (39/70)		50% (21/42)	+6pp
ancient	58% (48/83)		55% (66/120)	+3pp
mirage	—	·	49% (43/88)
vertigo	46% (6/13)		46% (22/48)	0pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Lynn Vision bans

vertigo 46% WR

nuke 49% WR

Ninjas in Pyjamas bans

dust2 38% WR

overpass 40% WR

Lynn Vision pick

ancient

51% — Lynn Vision favored

Decider

inferno

56% Lynn Vision

Decider

mirage

Ninjas in Pyjamas pick

anubis

47% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

65%

35%

Lynn Vision

overpass

61%

39%

Lynn Vision

inferno

56%

44%

Lynn Vision

nuke

45%

55%

Ninjas in Pyjamas

anubis

53%

47%

even

ancient

51%

49%

even

vertigo

50%

even

Lynn Vision on left · Ninjas in Pyjamas on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lynn Vision WIN
MVP C4LLM3SU3 RIFLER	51	32	12	49%	77.6	79.0%	1.34	7.9
z4KR AWP	49	36	20	41%	84.2	79.0%	1.31	9.2
EmiliaQAQ RIFLER	50	37	12	56%	81.3	71.0%	1.24	8.7
westmelon	43	42	22	51%	78.1	71.0%	1.10	—
Starry RIFLER	38	41	23	66%	78.3	71.0%	1.05	8.8
Ninjas in Pyjamas
MVP stavn RIFLER	48	38	2	25%	77.0	64.5%	1.13	9.3
xKacpersky RIFLER	33	46	18	64%	70.3	64.5%	0.85	9.1
Snappi ENTRY	35	47	13	63%	63.4	62.9%	0.83	8.5
sjuush RIFLER	33	46	8	67%	62.6	62.9%	0.80	8.9
cairne RIFLER	32	49	13	59%	60.9	59.7%	0.74	8.9

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lynn Vision
C4LLM3SU3	22	14	2	55%	88.4	73.9%	1.40	7.9
EmiliaQAQ	23	15	3	57%	97.1	65.2%	1.38	8.7
z4kr	12	17	6	58%	57.4	73.9%	0.87	9.2
westmelon	9	19	9	56%	62.8	65.2%	0.68	—
Starry	7	18	7	57%	54.2	60.9%	0.56	8.8
Ninjas in Pyjamas WIN
stavn	24	11	1	17%	104.3	82.6%	1.65	9.3
Snappi	18	15	6	61%	83.1	82.6%	1.29	8.5
xKacpersky	16	15	4	69%	83.2	69.6%	1.11	9.1
sjuush	12	15	2	83%	61.0	73.9%	0.91	8.9
cairne	12	16	7	58%	59.3	73.9%	0.90	8.9

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lynn Vision WIN
z4kr	22	8	2	41%	118.4	88.2%	1.96	9.2
C4LLM3SU3	14	8	7	43%	85.2	94.1%	1.52	7.9
EmiliaQAQ	16	10	5	69%	88.8	82.4%	1.48	8.7
westmelon	15	10	9	53%	93.2	82.4%	1.46	—
Starry	10	12	10	60%	69.2	70.6%	0.99	8.8
Ninjas in Pyjamas
stavn	12	12	0	58%	68.1	58.8%	0.94	9.3
xKacpersky	10	14	4	60%	70.1	64.7%	0.85	9.1
cairne	8	16	3	63%	55.8	41.2%	0.46	8.9
sjuush	6	16	5	67%	49.7	52.9%	0.44	8.9
Snappi	8	16	1	75%	52.1	41.2%	0.44	8.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lynn Vision WIN
Starry	21	11	6	71%	110.6	81.8%	1.60	8.8
z4kr	15	11	12	27%	85.7	77.3%	1.28	9.2
westmelon	19	13	4	47%	82.4	68.2%	1.27	—
C4LLM3SU3	15	10	3	47%	60.5	72.7%	1.15	7.9
EmiliaQAQ	11	12	4	36%	59.1	68.2%	0.91	8.7
Ninjas in Pyjamas
sjuush	15	15	1	53%	74.3	59.1%	0.96	8.9
cairne	12	17	3	58%	66.5	59.1%	0.78	8.9
stavn	12	15	1	8%	55.5	50.0%	0.72	9.3
Snappi	9	16	6	56%	51.6	59.1%	0.65	8.5
xKacpersky	7	17	10	57%	57.0	59.1%	0.58	9.1

Teams

Players in this match

C4LLM3SU3 z4KR EmiliaQAQ stavn westmelon Starry xKacpersky Snappi sjuush cairne