MIBR vs PARIVISION — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-20

MIBR Winner

2 : 0

MIBR wins

PARIVISION

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	MIBR	PARIVISION	Edge
dust2	38% (3/8)	74% (74/100)	-36pp
vertigo	60% (49/82)	33% (7/21)	+27pp
nuke	59% (72/122)	41% (12/29)	+18pp
anubis	63% (69/109)	47% (30/64)	+16pp
overpass	47% (14/30)	38% (8/21)	+9pp
mirage	47% (43/91)	55% (77/139)	-8pp
ancient	65% (72/111)	59% (78/133)	+6pp
inferno	66% (63/96)	62% (34/55)	+4pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

MIBR bans

dust2 38% WR

overpass 47% WR

PARIVISION bans

vertigo 33% WR

nuke 41% WR

MIBR pick

inferno

52% — MIBR favored

Decider

mirage

54% PARIVISION

Decider

anubis

57% MIBR

PARIVISION pick

ancient

48% — PARIVISION favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

34%

66%

PARIVISION

vertigo

65%

35%

MIBR

nuke

59%

41%

MIBR

anubis

57%

43%

MIBR

overpass

55%

45%

MIBR

mirage

46%

54%

even

ancient

52%

48%

even

inferno

52%

48%

even

MIBR on left · PARIVISION on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR WIN
MVP insani RIFLER	38	23	10	50%	110.0	76.3%	1.54	9.3
kl1m RIFLER	32	15	6	41%	86.1	81.6%	1.47	9.4
venomzera RIFLER	31	24	12	58%	93.0	68.4%	1.26	9.0
brnz4n RIFLER	24	20	8	71%	71.7	73.7%	1.12	8.9
LNZ SUPPORT	24	19	6	71%	62.5	76.3%	1.11	8.9
PARIVISION
MVP BELCHONOKK RIFLER	29	29	4	62%	83.9	57.9%	1.02	9.6
zweih RIFLER	24	29	5	54%	71.6	52.6%	0.83	9.7
Jame AWP	20	27	5	25%	71.0	60.5%	0.82	9.8
nota SUPPORT	15	32	7	73%	54.8	52.6%	0.53	9.5
xiELO ENTRY	13	32	1	69%	36.6	44.7%	0.36	9.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR
kl1m	18	9	4	39%	86.7	80.0%	1.48	9.4
brnz4n	19	10	1	79%	97.3	70.0%	1.44	8.9
insani	14	12	6	50%	77.4	70.0%	1.14	9.3
venomzera	16	15	4	50%	90.9	55.0%	1.07	9.0
LNZ	9	12	5	89%	56.9	70.0%	0.85	8.9
PARIVISION
BELCHONOKK	17	15	2	53%	90.7	65.0%	1.17	9.6
zweih	13	14	2	46%	68.4	60.0%	0.92	9.7
nota	10	15	3	80%	65.3	55.0%	0.72	9.5
Jame	8	14	3	13%	51.0	60.0%	0.65	9.8
xiELO	10	18	0	70%	51.2	50.0%	0.54	9.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MIBR
insani	24	11	4	50%	146.2	83.3%	1.99	9.3
venomzera	15	9	8	67%	95.2	83.3%	1.47	9.0
kl1m	14	6	2	43%	85.4	83.3%	1.45	9.4
LNZ	15	7	1	60%	68.7	83.3%	1.41	8.9
brnz4n	5	10	7	40%	43.2	77.8%	0.75	8.9
PARIVISION
Jame	12	13	2	33%	93.2	61.1%	1.01	9.8
BELCHONOKK	12	14	2	75%	76.3	50.0%	0.84	9.6
zweih	11	15	3	64%	75.2	44.4%	0.73	9.7
nota	5	17	4	60%	43.2	50.0%	0.32	9.5
xiELO	3	14	1	67%	20.4	38.9%	0.15	9.5

Teams

Players in this match

insani kl1m venomzera brnz4n LNZ BELCHONOKK zweih Jame nota xiELO