Legacy vs TYLOO — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-20

Legacy Winner

2 : 0

Legacy wins

TYLOO

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Legacy	TYLOO	Edge
dust2	60% (43/72)	0% (0/1)	+60pp
anubis	52% (35/67)	67% (36/54)	-15pp
vertigo	43% (3/7)	55% (6/11)	-12pp
ancient	61% (62/102)	50% (37/74)	+11pp
inferno	64% (63/99)	56% (60/108)	+8pp
mirage	65% (64/98)	70% (57/82)	-5pp
overpass	55% (16/29)	51% (20/39)	+4pp
nuke	62% (48/78)	60% (40/67)	+2pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Legacy bans

vertigo 43% WR

anubis 52% WR

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

overpass 51% WR

Legacy pick

mirage

48% — Legacy favored

Decider

inferno

53% Legacy

Decider

dust2

100% Legacy

TYLOO pick

nuke

49% — TYLOO favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

Legacy

anubis

44%

56%

TYLOO

vertigo

44%

56%

TYLOO

ancient

55%

45%

Legacy

inferno

53%

47%

even

mirage

48%

52%

even

overpass

52%

48%

even

nuke

51%

49%

even

Legacy on left · TYLOO on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Legacy WIN
MVP latto RIFLER	52	39	21	48%	93.8	80.0%	1.35	9.7
saadzin AWP	41	27	15	17%	63.5	84.6%	1.23	9.8
n1ssim RIFLER	48	36	14	54%	80.0	73.9%	1.22	9.6
dumau RIFLER	46	38	18	46%	80.3	78.5%	1.22	9.7
arT	40	43	23	50%	72.5	67.7%	1.00	—
TYLOO
MVP Moseyuh RIFLER	41	46	10	61%	71.2	70.8%	0.99	9.1
Zero	38	47	14	50%	75.2	66.2%	0.93	—
JamYoung RIFLER	39	45	11	59%	67.8	61.5%	0.89	9.1
Jee AWP	31	42	16	16%	54.0	66.2%	0.81	9.3
Mercury RIFLER	32	50	10	50%	57.4	61.5%	0.73	9.1

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Legacy
saadzin	19	9	5	16%	69.5	89.7%	1.36	9.8
n1ssim	24	16	4	54%	85.9	72.4%	1.30	9.6
latto	19	16	13	58%	87.8	82.8%	1.26	9.7
dumau	17	14	9	53%	67.8	79.3%	1.14	9.7
arT	20	19	9	55%	75.3	58.6%	1.01	—
TYLOO
Moseyuh	19	19	4	58%	72.2	69.0%	1.03	9.1
Zero	18	21	3	44%	73.3	72.4%	0.99	—
Jee	11	18	9	18%	48.7	69.0%	0.75	9.3
Mercury	13	20	5	62%	58.9	62.1%	0.74	9.1
JamYoung	12	22	4	58%	50.0	51.7%	0.57	9.1

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Legacy
latto	33	23	8	42%	98.6	77.8%	1.42	9.7
dumau	29	24	9	41%	90.4	77.8%	1.28	9.7
n1ssim	24	20	10	54%	75.3	75.0%	1.16	9.6
saadzin	22	18	10	18%	58.7	80.6%	1.13	9.8
arT	20	24	14	45%	70.2	75.0%	1.00	—
TYLOO
JamYoung	27	23	7	59%	82.1	69.4%	1.16	9.1
Moseyuh	22	27	6	64%	70.4	72.2%	0.96	9.1
Zero	20	26	11	55%	76.6	61.1%	0.88	—
Jee	20	24	7	15%	58.3	63.9%	0.86	9.3
Mercury	19	30	5	42%	56.2	61.1%	0.71	9.1

Teams

Players in this match

latto saadzin n1ssim dumau arT Moseyuh Zero JamYoung Jee Mercury