CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Tricked | vs | HOTU | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
51% (25/49) |
|
0% (0/4) | +51pp |
dust2
|
28% (7/25) |
|
57% (37/65) | -29pp |
vertigo
|
0% (0/1) |
|
22% (2/9) | -22pp |
mirage
|
43% (24/56) |
|
60% (34/57) | -17pp |
ancient
|
49% (28/57) |
|
65% (57/88) | -16pp |
overpass
|
70% (21/30) |
|
55% (21/38) | +15pp |
anubis
|
50% (3/6) |
|
57% (21/37) | -7pp |
nuke
|
55% (39/71) |
|
56% (33/59) | -1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Tricked bans
dust2
28% WR
mirage
43% WR
HOTU bans
inferno
0% WR
overpass
55% WR
Tricked pick
nuke
50% — Tricked favored
Decider
anubis
53% HOTU
Decider
vertigo
100% HOTU
HOTU pick
ancient
57% — HOTU favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
Tricked
dust2
HOTU
vertigo
HOTU
mirage
HOTU
ancient
HOTU
overpass
Tricked
anubis
even
nuke
even
Tricked on left ·
HOTU on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.