1win vs Nuclear TigeRES

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

1win Winner

2 : 0

1win wins

Nuclear TigeRES

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	1win	vs	Nuclear TigeRES	Edge
vertigo	57% (20/35)		0% (0/1)	+57pp
ancient	47% (50/106)		73% (64/88)	-26pp
dust2	64% (68/106)		44% (28/63)	+20pp
nuke	59% (19/32)		46% (22/48)	+13pp
anubis	57% (24/42)		66% (21/32)	-9pp
mirage	60% (60/100)		56% (20/36)	+4pp
inferno	69% (47/68)		69% (27/39)	0pp
overpass	53% (29/55)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

1win bans

ancient 47% WR

anubis 57% WR

Nuclear TigeRES bans

dust2 44% WR

nuke 46% WR

1win pick

inferno

50% — 1win favored

Decider

overpass

Decider

vertigo

100% 1win

Nuclear TigeRES pick

mirage

48% — Nuclear TigeRES favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

vertigo

100%

1win

ancient

39%

61%

Nuclear TigeRES

dust2

59%

41%

1win

nuke

56%

44%

1win

anubis

46%

54%

even

mirage

52%

48%

even

inferno

50%

even

1win on left · Nuclear TigeRES on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
MVP oz1k RIFLER	44	24	8	57%	96.4	78.6%	1.56	8.4
cronuss ENTRY	41	30	11	66%	103.9	76.2%	1.44	8.1
lattykk AWP	32	23	8	31%	83.1	73.8%	1.25	8.9
Qikert RIFLER	23	28	13	52%	60.5	78.6%	0.98	8.2
reyoz	24	27	9	46%	59.6	71.4%	0.95	—
Nuclear TigeRES
MVP flouzer RIFLER	29	31	10	45%	70.3	66.7%	1.00	7.7
z1k4 AWP	30	33	8	30%	74.4	64.3%	0.99	8.3
ayuki	28	35	11	39%	81.6	66.7%	0.97	—
m1QUSE RIFLER	23	30	7	35%	58.6	59.5%	0.79	7.8
senka ENTRY	20	33	9	45%	55.1	54.8%	0.65	7.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
oz1k	18	9	5	44%	91.4	84.2%	1.56	8.4
cronuss	17	11	7	71%	109.5	84.2%	1.53	8.1
lattykk	15	9	2	40%	85.6	68.4%	1.28	8.9
Qikert	12	9	2	75%	73.0	79.0%	1.18	8.2
reyoz	9	10	6	44%	52.0	79.0%	0.96	—
Nuclear TigeRES
ayuki	11	16	9	36%	86.8	68.4%	0.94	—
z1k4	13	15	3	46%	80.4	57.9%	0.93	8.3
flouzer	9	12	4	44%	51.2	63.2%	0.78	7.7
m1QUSE	8	13	3	38%	50.2	52.6%	0.62	7.8
senka	6	14	0	33%	38.2	36.8%	0.33	7.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
oz1k	26	15	3	65%	100.6	73.9%	1.57	8.4
cronuss	24	19	4	63%	99.3	69.6%	1.37	8.1
lattykk	17	14	6	24%	80.9	78.3%	1.23	8.9
reyoz	15	17	3	47%	65.8	65.2%	0.93	—
Qikert	11	19	11	27%	50.1	78.3%	0.81	8.2
Nuclear TigeRES
flouzer	20	19	6	45%	86.0	69.6%	1.18	7.7
z1k4	17	18	5	18%	69.4	69.6%	1.04	8.3
ayuki	17	19	2	41%	77.2	65.2%	0.99	—
m1QUSE	15	17	4	33%	65.4	65.2%	0.93	7.8
senka	14	19	9	50%	69.0	69.6%	0.92	7.2

Teams

Players in this match

oz1k cronuss lattykk flouzer z1k4 Qikert ayuki reyoz m1QUSE senka