1win vs FOKUS — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-20

1win Winner

2 : 1

1win wins

FOKUS

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	1win	vs	FOKUS	Edge
ancient	47% (50/106)		100% (17/17)	-53pp
overpass	53% (29/55)		83% (5/6)	-30pp
dust2	64% (68/106)		44% (8/18)	+20pp
inferno	69% (47/68)		54% (7/13)	+15pp
mirage	60% (60/100)		53% (8/15)	+7pp
nuke	59% (19/32)		55% (6/11)	+4pp
anubis	57% (24/42)	·	—
vertigo	57% (20/35)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

1win bans

ancient 47% WR

overpass 53% WR

FOKUS bans

dust2 44% WR

mirage 53% WR

1win pick

inferno

56% — 1win favored

Decider

anubis

Decider

vertigo

FOKUS pick

nuke

48% — FOKUS favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

ancient

32%

68%

FOKUS

overpass

39%

61%

FOKUS

dust2

59%

41%

1win

inferno

56%

44%

1win

mirage

53%

47%

even

nuke

52%

48%

even

1win on left · FOKUS on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
MVP reyoz	44	32	18	48%	88.5	75.0%	1.33	—
cronuss ENTRY	48	34	7	50%	98.8	63.5%	1.30	8.1
lattykk AWP	35	30	10	26%	74.9	69.2%	1.10	8.9
Qikert RIFLER	34	30	16	62%	69.3	71.2%	1.09	8.2
oz1k RIFLER	27	31	8	48%	64.0	63.5%	0.88	8.4
FOKUS
MVP Jorko AWP	35	34	9	34%	73.0	63.5%	1.01	8.6
Matheos RIFLER	35	39	10	71%	75.4	59.6%	0.94	8.4
Banjo RIFLER	28	34	10	54%	66.5	63.5%	0.87	8.5
volt SUPPORT	27	37	10	59%	67.3	65.4%	0.84	8.2
ztr ENTRY	27	40	10	63%	62.6	51.9%	0.70	8.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win
reyoz	10	14	4	70%	65.1	56.3%	0.78	—
Qikert	9	12	2	56%	55.1	56.3%	0.75	8.2
cronuss	7	15	4	43%	55.6	50.0%	0.51	8.1
lattykk	6	12	2	33%	51.8	43.8%	0.48	8.9
oz1k	5	15	1	60%	54.7	31.3%	0.24	8.4
FOKUS
Banjo	17	5	3	53%	100.9	87.5%	1.79	8.5
ztr	18	9	3	67%	117.9	87.5%	1.77	8.0
Jorko	13	7	4	23%	81.1	81.3%	1.41	8.6
Matheos	12	8	5	67%	72.4	62.5%	1.16	8.4
volt	8	8	3	50%	70.1	81.3%	1.06	8.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win
Qikert	15	8	7	67%	90.6	72.2%	1.40	8.2
lattykk	14	9	4	14%	84.7	77.8%	1.33	8.9
reyoz	14	10	3	64%	84.8	66.7%	1.21	—
cronuss	15	13	2	53%	89.1	50.0%	1.06	8.1
oz1k	10	11	3	50%	64.5	66.7%	0.93	8.4
FOKUS
Matheos	19	14	2	68%	112.8	77.8%	1.50	8.4
volt	11	13	4	55%	72.4	61.1%	0.91	8.2
Jorko	9	13	3	56%	52.4	55.6%	0.70	8.6
Banjo	6	14	4	67%	44.3	55.6%	0.50	8.5
ztr	6	14	4	50%	39.9	38.9%	0.37	8.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win
cronuss	26	6	1	50%	146.9	88.9%	2.26	8.1
reyoz	20	8	11	25%	113.0	100.0%	1.94	—
lattykk	15	9	4	33%	85.6	83.3%	1.42	8.9
oz1k	12	5	4	42%	71.7	88.9%	1.39	8.4
Qikert	10	10	7	60%	60.6	83.3%	1.09	8.2
FOKUS
Jorko	13	14	2	31%	86.4	55.6%	0.96	8.6
volt	8	16	3	75%	59.7	55.6%	0.59	8.2
Banjo	5	15	3	40%	58.2	50.0%	0.43	8.5
Matheos	4	17	3	100%	40.6	38.9%	0.18	8.4
ztr	3	17	3	67%	36.1	33.3%	0.08	8.0

Teams

Players in this match

reyoz cronuss lattykk Qikert Jorko Matheos oz1k Banjo volt ztr