Chinggis Warriors vs IHC

T3 BO3 CS2 2024-05-03

Chinggis Warriors Winner

2 : 1

Chinggis Warriors wins

IHC

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Chinggis Warriors	vs	IHC	Edge
dust2	51% (18/35)		18% (3/17)	+33pp
anubis	45% (17/38)		53% (9/17)	-8pp
nuke	58% (38/66)		65% (22/34)	-7pp
mirage	52% (24/46)		47% (7/15)	+5pp
overpass	56% (5/9)		60% (6/10)	-4pp
inferno	48% (29/60)		49% (24/49)	-1pp
ancient	58% (49/85)		59% (26/44)	-1pp
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Chinggis Warriors bans

anubis 45% WR

inferno 48% WR

IHC bans

dust2 18% WR

mirage 47% WR

Chinggis Warriors pick

ancient

50% — Chinggis Warriors favored

Decider

overpass

52% IHC

Decider

vertigo

IHC pick

nuke

53% — IHC favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

74%

26%

Chinggis Warriors

anubis

46%

54%

even

nuke

47%

53%

even

mirage

53%

47%

even

overpass

48%

52%

even

inferno

49%

51%

even

ancient

50%

even

Chinggis Warriors on left · IHC on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chinggis Warriors WIN
MVP ZILKENBERG	54	35	12	26%	80.6	77.6%	1.32	—
NEUZ RIFLER	52	47	11	67%	89.5	65.7%	1.14	6.5
STARDUST	49	46	12	57%	83.6	65.7%	1.09	—
xerolte RIFLER	43	49	21	51%	82.3	65.7%	1.00	8.7
FURY5K	40	52	21	65%	86.5	64.2%	0.94	—
IHC
MVP ACCURACYTG	56	42	6	30%	83.1	77.6%	1.29	—
ARIUCLE	51	47	12	63%	87.3	61.2%	1.09	—
EFIRE	46	50	11	57%	77.3	59.7%	0.96	—
WONDERZ	38	51	15	53%	75.6	71.6%	0.93	—
ROUX	38	50	20	58%	81.4	59.7%	0.88	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chinggis Warriors WIN
NEUZ	23	14	5	74%	113.9	82.6%	1.59	6.5
ZILKENBERG	15	10	6	27%	73.6	82.6%	1.26	—
STARDUST	18	16	4	44%	90.3	69.6%	1.18	—
FURY5K	14	17	10	64%	92.3	73.9%	1.07	—
XEROLTE	16	16	4	38%	68.8	65.2%	1.01	8.7
IHC
ACCURACYTG	17	17	0	29%	72.4	73.9%	1.08	—
ARIUCLE	16	18	3	63%	76.6	65.2%	0.98	—
EFIRE	16	16	2	63%	73.0	60.9%	0.98	—
ROUX	12	16	7	67%	83.4	69.6%	0.95	—
WONDERZ	12	21	5	67%	73.2	65.2%	0.76	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chinggis Warriors WIN
XEROLTE	19	16	10	53%	110.3	75.0%	1.33	8.7
ZILKENBERG	18	13	1	28%	76.7	75.0%	1.22	—
NEUZ	18	15	2	67%	71.1	58.3%	1.04	6.5
STARDUST	17	18	5	71%	80.1	62.5%	1.01	—
FURY5K	13	20	6	54%	76.8	58.3%	0.78	—
IHC
ACCURACYTG	21	14	5	24%	94.7	83.3%	1.44	—
ROUX	19	19	8	58%	99.5	58.3%	1.10	—
WONDERZ	13	17	7	38%	70.7	79.2%	0.99	—
ARIUCLE	15	17	6	87%	82.1	58.3%	0.94	—
EFIRE	14	18	4	50%	63.8	62.5%	0.84	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chinggis Warriors
ZILKENBERG	21	12	5	24%	93.3	75.0%	1.52	—
STARDUST	14	12	3	57%	80.0	65.0%	1.09	—
FURY5K	13	15	5	77%	91.6	60.0%	0.98	—
NEUZ	11	18	4	55%	83.3	55.0%	0.75	6.5
XEROLTE	8	17	7	75%	64.5	55.0%	0.60	8.7
IHC WIN
ARIUCLE	20	12	3	45%	105.9	60.0%	1.40	—
ACCURACYTG	18	11	1	39%	81.5	75.0%	1.36	—
WONDERZ	13	13	3	54%	84.3	70.0%	1.07	—
EFIRE	16	16	5	56%	98.5	55.0%	1.07	—
ROUX	7	15	5	43%	57.4	50.0%	0.54	—

Teams

Players in this match

ZILKENBERG ACCURACYTG NEUZ STARDUST ARIUCLE xerolte EFIRE FURY5K WONDERZ ROUX