MIBR vs ODDIK — CounterQuant

MATCHES / #2371151

HLTV

T3 · BO3 CS2 · 2024-04-05 FINAL

MIBR

WINNER

2 : 1

SERIES COMPLETE

ODDIK

CHALLENGER

/// MIRAGE v6 · MAP POOL EDGE

Map pool strength

HISTORICAL MATCH

vertigo 62% MIBR

mirage 40% MIBR

inferno 61% MIBR

dust2 40% MIBR

overpass 45% MIBR

ancient 53% MIBR

nuke 52% MIBR

anubis 48% MIBR

CQ-GESUS SUITE Models run for upcoming matches only. View prediction ledger →

SERIES RESULT

2 : 1

MIBR

SERIES WINNER

MIBR

ODDIK

/// MIRAGE v6 PER-MAP ENGINE

Veto simulation & map probabilities

BO3 BAN/PICK SIM

vertigo 62% MIBR

mirage 40% MIBR

inferno 61% MIBR

dust2 40% MIBR

overpass 45% MIBR

ancient 53% MIBR

nuke 52% MIBR

anubis 48% MIBR

Each side bans its worst maps, picks its best — simulated 10,000×.

PLAYED SERIES — MAP RESULTS

nuke 5 – 13 ODDIK took the map.

inferno 13 – 10 MIBR took the map.

ancient 13 – 4 MIBR took the map.

Side

MIBR WIN

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MVP brnz4n RIFLER	44	35	16	57%	86.6	76.3%	1.25	9.1
insani RIFLER	44	37	11	59%	91.1	66.1%	1.17	9.2
saffee AWP	35	37	11	43%	75.4	67.8%	1.00	9.1
exit`	31	37	14	42%	61.0	72.9%	0.93	—
drop	30	38	6	57%	67.2	67.8%	0.88	—
▸ Observers (1)
◥◣◢◤ ◥◣◢◤	— observer —

ODDIK

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MVP ponter RIFLER	46	38	3	35%	82.4	59.3%	1.09	7.3
matios	37	38	19	49%	85.7	66.1%	1.05	—
☭ tuurtle	35	37	13	60%	74.8	64.4%	0.97	—
naitte	31	37	15	71%	71.3	72.9%	0.97	—
wood777	30	43	11	37%	61.4	61.0%	0.77	—

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
saffee	14	16	2	57%	103.2	61.1%	1.05	9.1
brnz4n	10	11	1	50%	62.9	77.8%	0.99	9.1
exit`	9	12	2	44%	62.1	66.7%	0.84	—
drop	7	12	1	57%	69.1	61.1%	0.72	—
insani	8	15	4	100%	68.5	50.0%	0.61	9.2
▸ Observers (1)
◥◣◢◤ ◥◣◢◤	— observer —

ODDIK WIN

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
matios	14	8	9	57%	97.2	94.4%	1.55	—
ponter	16	11	2	44%	92.3	72.2%	1.34	7.3
naitte	14	11	5	71%	87.8	83.3%	1.33	—
☭ tuurtle	11	9	4	91%	79.4	66.7%	1.09	—
wood777	10	12	2	60%	62.2	66.7%	0.88	—

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
brnz4n	21	14	10	62%	100.9	79.2%	1.45	9.1
insani	22	16	6	41%	101.6	66.7%	1.34	9.2
saffee	13	13	8	46%	65.8	75.0%	1.03	9.1
exit`	14	15	8	29%	65.6	75.0%	1.02	—
drop	10	16	3	40%	52.2	66.7%	0.73	—

ODDIK

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
naitte	13	13	7	62%	81.3	83.3%	1.14	—
☭ tuurtle	16	17	5	38%	76.6	66.7%	1.01	—
matios	15	16	7	53%	86.3	58.3%	0.98	—
ponter	16	16	1	38%	72.7	54.2%	0.92	7.3
wood777	11	19	8	36%	60.2	62.5%	0.72	—

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
insani	14	6	1	64%	100.2	82.4%	1.51	9.2
drop	13	10	2	69%	86.4	76.5%	1.26	—
brnz4n	13	10	5	54%	91.6	70.6%	1.25	9.1
exit`	8	10	4	63%	53.2	76.5%	0.91	—
saffee	8	8	1	13%	59.6	64.7%	0.89	9.1

ODDIK

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ponter	14	11	0	21%	85.7	52.9%	1.09	7.3
☭ tuurtle	8	11	4	63%	67.4	58.8%	0.79	—
wood777	9	12	1	11%	62.1	52.9%	0.73	—
matios	8	14	3	25%	72.7	47.1%	0.62	—
naitte	4	13	3	100%	39.6	47.1%	0.35	—

/// SPECTER v1 · AUC 0.9035

Live win probability — nuke

RECONSTRUCTED POST-MATCH

⚡ SPECTER re-prices win probability after every kill, plant and save. Momentum swings visible per round.

◈ Economy discipline is the single strongest in-game predictor — full-buy vs eco collapse shows clearly.

⬡ Round-by-round reconstruction runs post-match from validated V4 demo data. Check back after parse.

TEAMS

PLAYERS IN THIS MATCH

brnz4n insani ponter matios saffee ☭ tuurtle naitte exit` drop wood777