MIBR vs Fluxo — CounterQuant

MATCHES / #2370796

HLTV

T2 · BO3 CS2 · 2024-04-04 FINAL

MIBR

WINNER

2 : 1

SERIES COMPLETE

Fluxo

CHALLENGER

/// MIRAGE v6 · MAP POOL EDGE

Map pool strength

HISTORICAL MATCH

anubis 66% MIBR

dust2 41% MIBR

inferno 55% MIBR

mirage 45% MIBR

vertigo 52% MIBR

nuke 49% MIBR

overpass 51% MIBR

ancient 50% MIBR

CQ-GESUS SUITE Models run for upcoming matches only. View prediction ledger →

SERIES RESULT

2 : 1

MIBR

SERIES WINNER

MIBR

FLUXO

/// MIRAGE v6 PER-MAP ENGINE

Veto simulation & map probabilities

BO3 BAN/PICK SIM

anubis 66% MIBR

dust2 41% MIBR

inferno 55% MIBR

mirage 45% MIBR

vertigo 52% MIBR

nuke 49% MIBR

overpass 51% MIBR

ancient 50% MIBR

Each side bans its worst maps, picks its best — simulated 10,000×.

PLAYED SERIES — MAP RESULTS

nuke 13 – 11 MIBR took the map.

ancient 13 – 6 MIBR took the map.

vertigo 9 – 13 Fluxo took the map.

Side

MIBR WIN

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MVP saffee AWP	53	41	10	21%	88.9	72.3%	1.26	9.0
insani RIFLER	49	47	16	51%	99.5	64.6%	1.14	9.3
exit	40	37	15	57%	74.7	69.2%	1.06	—
brnz4n RIFLER	43	40	8	58%	74.5	60.0%	0.99	8.9
drop	35	43	14	57%	69.2	66.2%	0.90	—
▸ Observers (2)
Coach \| nak	— observer —
Coach \| turner	— observer —

Fluxo

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MVP Zevy	53	43	14	36%	90.3	72.3%	1.25	—
Lucaozy	44	47	17	52%	90.8	66.2%	1.06	—
chay	43	45	12	51%	76.7	61.5%	0.98	—
v$m	38	42	13	50%	66.4	64.6%	0.93	—
PKL ENTRY	28	47	14	57%	63.3	58.5%	0.70	6.8

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
saffee	21	17	1	29%	98.6	66.7%	1.25	9.0
exit	18	13	5	56%	96.1	62.5%	1.21	—
brnz4n	18	16	2	61%	86.5	62.5%	1.10	8.9
insani	15	18	4	67%	83.5	50.0%	0.85	9.3
drop	3	19	7	67%	36.4	50.0%	0.26	—
▸ Observers (2)
Coach \| turner	— observer —
Coach \| nak	— observer —

Fluxo

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Zevy	21	16	4	33%	99.4	79.2%	1.38	—
v$m	17	14	3	71%	84.3	70.8%	1.16	—
chay	17	17	4	47%	89.8	70.8%	1.12	—
Lucaozy	13	15	3	62%	69.0	58.3%	0.86	—
PKL	13	16	5	54%	64.6	58.3%	0.83	6.8

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
brnz4n	19	8	3	42%	99.5	68.4%	1.54	8.9
drop	16	8	2	69%	93.0	84.2%	1.49	—
insani	14	12	6	43%	100.9	84.2%	1.33	9.3
saffee	13	9	4	15%	78.2	73.7%	1.21	9.0
exit	10	9	5	60%	64.1	73.7%	1.03	—
▸ Observers (2)
Coach \| nak	— observer —
Coach \| turner	— observer —

Fluxo

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Zevy	16	14	1	31%	84.7	57.9%	1.10	—
Lucaozy	13	16	5	31%	97.6	68.4%	1.04	—
chay	8	13	4	75%	52.5	47.4%	0.60	—
PKL	5	14	4	100%	57.9	52.6%	0.49	6.8
v$m	4	15	2	25%	30.8	36.8%	0.20	—

MIBR

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
saffee	19	15	5	16%	87.7	77.3%	1.31	9.0
insani	20	17	6	45%	115.9	63.6%	1.30	9.3
drop	16	16	5	44%	84.4	68.2%	1.09	—
exit	12	15	5	58%	60.5	72.7%	0.92	—
brnz4n	6	16	3	100%	39.7	50.0%	0.42	8.9
▸ Observers (2)
Coach \| nak	— observer —
Coach \| turner	— observer —

Fluxo WIN

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Lucaozy	18	16	9	61%	108.8	72.7%	1.30	—
v$m	17	13	8	35%	77.6	81.8%	1.30	—
Zevy	16	13	9	44%	85.2	77.3%	1.25	—
chay	18	15	4	44%	83.2	63.6%	1.15	—
PKL	10	17	5	40%	66.6	63.6%	0.74	6.8

/// SPECTER v1 · AUC 0.9035

Live win probability — nuke

RECONSTRUCTED POST-MATCH

⚡ SPECTER re-prices win probability after every kill, plant and save. Momentum swings visible per round.

◈ Economy discipline is the single strongest in-game predictor — full-buy vs eco collapse shows clearly.

⬡ Round-by-round reconstruction runs post-match from validated V4 demo data. Check back after parse.

TEAMS

PLAYERS IN THIS MATCH

saffee Zevy insani Lucaozy exit brnz4n chay v$m drop PKL