T2
BO3
CSGO
2020-06-23
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Ground Zero | vs | Rooster | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
50% (4/8) |
|
0% (0/1) | +50pp |
overpass
|
33% (1/3) |
|
70% (37/53) | -37pp |
mirage
|
47% (15/32) |
|
58% (46/80) | -11pp |
anubis
|
45% (9/20) |
|
54% (31/57) | -9pp |
inferno
|
59% (19/32) |
|
51% (41/80) | +8pp |
nuke
|
48% (16/33) |
|
53% (48/90) | -5pp |
dust2
|
56% (18/32) |
|
56% (30/54) | 0pp |
vertigo
|
— | · | 54% (21/39) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Ground Zero bans
overpass
33% WR
anubis
45% WR
Rooster bans
inferno
51% WR
nuke
53% WR
Ground Zero pick
dust2
50% — Ground Zero favored
Decider
ancient
100% Ground Zero
Decider
vertigo
Rooster pick
mirage
55% — Rooster favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Ground Zero
overpass
Rooster
mirage
Rooster
anubis
Rooster
inferno
even
nuke
even
dust2
even
Ground Zero on left ·
Rooster on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.