T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-05-29
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Virtus.pro | vs | NAVI Junior | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
70% (37/53) |
|
0% (0/7) | +70pp |
nuke
|
100% (2/2) |
|
51% (28/55) | +49pp |
inferno
|
64% (43/67) |
|
43% (19/44) | +21pp |
anubis
|
50% (19/38) |
|
68% (38/56) | -18pp |
ancient
|
52% (42/81) |
|
68% (80/117) | -16pp |
dust2
|
50% (27/54) |
|
65% (30/46) | -15pp |
mirage
|
50% (36/72) |
|
59% (41/70) | -9pp |
vertigo
|
43% (15/35) |
|
50% (4/8) | -7pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Virtus.pro bans
vertigo
43% WR
anubis
50% WR
NAVI Junior bans
overpass
0% WR
inferno
43% WR
Virtus.pro pick
ancient
43% — Virtus.pro favored
Decider
mirage
54% NAVI Junior
Decider
nuke
66% Virtus.pro
NAVI Junior pick
dust2
57% — NAVI Junior favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
Virtus.pro
nuke
Virtus.pro
inferno
Virtus.pro
anubis
NAVI Junior
ancient
NAVI Junior
dust2
NAVI Junior
mirage
even
vertigo
even
Virtus.pro on left ·
NAVI Junior on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.