T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-06-05
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | Cloud9 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
31% (5/16) | +31pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
62% (30/48) | -22pp |
dust2
|
73% (19/26) |
|
52% (11/21) | +21pp |
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
52% (26/50) | +20pp |
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
53% (35/66) | +15pp |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) |
|
64% (23/36) | -14pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
59% (23/39) | +8pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
57% (31/54) | -7pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
vertigo
50% WR
Cloud9 bans
nuke
31% WR
dust2
52% WR
100 Thieves pick
inferno
58% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
ancient
56% 100 Thieves
Decider
mirage
53% Cloud9
Cloud9 pick
overpass
47% — Cloud9 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
100 Thieves
anubis
Cloud9
dust2
100 Thieves
inferno
100 Thieves
ancient
100 Thieves
vertigo
Cloud9
overpass
even
mirage
even
100 Thieves on left ·
Cloud9 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.