CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR | vs | Cloud9 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
59% (72/122) |
|
31% (5/16) | +28pp |
inferno
|
66% (63/96) |
|
52% (26/50) | +14pp |
dust2
|
38% (3/8) |
|
52% (11/21) | -14pp |
ancient
|
65% (72/111) |
|
53% (35/66) | +12pp |
overpass
|
47% (14/30) |
|
59% (23/39) | -12pp |
mirage
|
47% (43/91) |
|
57% (31/54) | -10pp |
vertigo
|
60% (49/82) |
|
64% (23/36) | -4pp |
anubis
|
63% (69/109) |
|
62% (30/48) | +1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
dust2
38% WR
overpass
47% WR
Cloud9 bans
nuke
31% WR
inferno
52% WR
MIBR pick
ancient
55% — MIBR favored
Decider
anubis
50% MIBR
Decider
mirage
55% Cloud9
Cloud9 pick
vertigo
52% — Cloud9 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
MIBR
inferno
MIBR
dust2
Cloud9
ancient
MIBR
overpass
Cloud9
mirage
Cloud9
vertigo
even
anubis
even
MIBR on left ·
Cloud9 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.