CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Secret | vs | SAW | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
0% (0/1) |
|
52% (24/46) | -52pp |
vertigo
|
100% (1/1) |
|
58% (40/69) | +42pp |
inferno
|
17% (1/6) |
|
57% (50/87) | -40pp |
anubis
|
18% (2/11) |
|
52% (38/73) | -34pp |
mirage
|
55% (6/11) |
|
22% (2/9) | +33pp |
ancient
|
31% (4/13) |
|
51% (59/116) | -20pp |
overpass
|
60% (3/5) |
|
50% (21/42) | +10pp |
nuke
|
— | · | 61% (89/145) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Secret bans
inferno
17% WR
anubis
18% WR
SAW bans
mirage
22% WR
overpass
50% WR
Secret pick
ancient
38% — Secret favored
Decider
dust2
100% SAW
Decider
nuke
SAW pick
vertigo
37% — SAW favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
SAW
vertigo
Secret
inferno
SAW
anubis
SAW
mirage
Secret
ancient
SAW
overpass
Secret
Secret on left ·
SAW on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.