T2 BO3 CSGO 2020-05-26
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map fnatic vs GODSENT Edge
dust2
48% (31/64)
0% (0/1) +48pp
nuke
52% (22/42)
33% (6/18) +19pp
overpass
56% (40/71)
45% (10/22) +11pp
vertigo
53% (31/58)
44% (7/16) +9pp
anubis
45% (33/74)
40% (2/5) +5pp
inferno
62% (71/114)
60% (18/30) +2pp
mirage
46% (50/109)
47% (14/30) -1pp
ancient
54% (83/153)
54% (20/37) 0pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
fnatic bans
anubis 45% WR
mirage 46% WR
GODSENT bans
nuke 33% WR
vertigo 44% WR
fnatic pick
inferno
51% — fnatic favored
Decider
dust2
100% fnatic
Decider
overpass
55% fnatic
GODSENT pick
ancient
50% — GODSENT favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100%
0%
fnatic
nuke
61%
39%
fnatic
overpass
55%
45%
fnatic
vertigo
55%
45%
fnatic
anubis
53%
47%
even
inferno
51%
49%
even
mirage
49%
51%
even
ancient
50%
50%
even
fnatic on left · GODSENT on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.