T2
BO3
CSGO
2020-05-30
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Evil Geniuses | vs | 100 Thieves | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
25% (1/4) |
|
73% (19/26) | -48pp |
overpass
|
31% (8/26) |
|
67% (2/3) | -36pp |
anubis
|
17% (1/6) |
|
40% (2/5) | -23pp |
ancient
|
50% (13/26) |
|
68% (15/22) | -18pp |
nuke
|
48% (13/27) |
|
62% (15/24) | -14pp |
mirage
|
61% (22/36) |
|
50% (7/14) | +11pp |
inferno
|
64% (21/33) |
|
72% (18/25) | -8pp |
vertigo
|
47% (7/15) |
|
50% (5/10) | -3pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Evil Geniuses bans
anubis
17% WR
dust2
25% WR
100 Thieves bans
mirage
50% WR
vertigo
50% WR
Evil Geniuses pick
inferno
47% — Evil Geniuses favored
Decider
overpass
68% 100 Thieves
Decider
nuke
56% 100 Thieves
100 Thieves pick
ancient
58% — 100 Thieves favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100 Thieves
overpass
100 Thieves
anubis
100 Thieves
ancient
100 Thieves
nuke
100 Thieves
mirage
Evil Geniuses
inferno
even
vertigo
even
Evil Geniuses on left ·
100 Thieves on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.