CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | GODSENT | vs | MOUZ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
0% (0/1) |
|
47% (28/60) | -47pp |
nuke
|
33% (6/18) |
|
61% (66/108) | -28pp |
overpass
|
45% (10/22) |
|
66% (31/47) | -21pp |
mirage
|
47% (14/30) |
|
56% (70/124) | -9pp |
vertigo
|
44% (7/16) |
|
53% (23/43) | -9pp |
ancient
|
54% (20/37) |
|
60% (49/81) | -6pp |
inferno
|
60% (18/30) |
|
62% (68/110) | -2pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
GODSENT bans
nuke
33% WR
overpass
45% WR
MOUZ bans
vertigo
53% WR
mirage
56% WR
GODSENT pick
inferno
49% — GODSENT favored
Decider
dust2
100% MOUZ
Decider
anubis
MOUZ pick
ancient
53% — MOUZ favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
MOUZ
nuke
MOUZ
overpass
MOUZ
mirage
even
vertigo
MOUZ
ancient
even
inferno
even
GODSENT on left ·
MOUZ on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.