T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-04-01
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | MIBR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
73% (19/26) |
|
38% (3/8) | +35pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
63% (69/109) | -23pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
47% (14/30) | +20pp |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) |
|
60% (49/82) | -10pp |
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
66% (63/96) | +6pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
47% (43/91) | +3pp |
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
59% (72/122) | +3pp |
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
65% (72/111) | +3pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
vertigo
50% WR
MIBR bans
dust2
38% WR
overpass
47% WR
100 Thieves pick
inferno
52% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
mirage
52% 100 Thieves
Decider
nuke
51% 100 Thieves
MIBR pick
ancient
49% — MIBR favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100 Thieves
anubis
MIBR
overpass
100 Thieves
vertigo
MIBR
inferno
even
mirage
even
nuke
even
ancient
even
100 Thieves on left ·
MIBR on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.