T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-03-20
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Ninjas in Pyjamas | vs | GODSENT | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
38% (20/53) |
|
0% (0/1) | +38pp |
nuke
|
60% (71/118) |
|
33% (6/18) | +27pp |
inferno
|
42% (22/53) |
|
60% (18/30) | -18pp |
anubis
|
50% (21/42) |
|
40% (2/5) | +10pp |
overpass
|
40% (20/50) |
|
45% (10/22) | -5pp |
mirage
|
49% (43/88) |
|
47% (14/30) | +2pp |
vertigo
|
46% (22/48) |
|
44% (7/16) | +2pp |
ancient
|
55% (66/120) |
|
54% (20/37) | +1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Ninjas in Pyjamas bans
overpass
40% WR
inferno
42% WR
GODSENT bans
nuke
33% WR
anubis
40% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas pick
ancient
50% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored
Decider
vertigo
51% Ninjas in Pyjamas
Decider
dust2
100% Ninjas in Pyjamas
GODSENT pick
mirage
49% — GODSENT favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
Ninjas in Pyjamas
nuke
Ninjas in Pyjamas
inferno
GODSENT
anubis
Ninjas in Pyjamas
overpass
even
mirage
even
vertigo
even
ancient
even
Ninjas in Pyjamas on left ·
GODSENT on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.