T2
BO3
CSGO
2020-03-07
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Ninjas in Pyjamas | vs | Apeks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
60% (71/118) |
|
0% (0/1) | +60pp |
inferno
|
42% (22/53) |
|
59% (26/44) | -17pp |
anubis
|
50% (21/42) |
|
59% (24/41) | -9pp |
mirage
|
49% (43/88) |
|
41% (20/49) | +8pp |
overpass
|
40% (20/50) |
|
47% (17/36) | -7pp |
vertigo
|
46% (22/48) |
|
50% (13/26) | -4pp |
ancient
|
55% (66/120) |
|
55% (35/64) | 0pp |
dust2
|
38% (20/53) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Ninjas in Pyjamas bans
overpass
40% WR
inferno
42% WR
Apeks bans
mirage
41% WR
vertigo
50% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas pick
ancient
50% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored
Decider
dust2
Decider
nuke
100% Ninjas in Pyjamas
Apeks pick
anubis
54% — Apeks favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
Ninjas in Pyjamas
inferno
Apeks
anubis
even
mirage
even
overpass
even
vertigo
even
ancient
even
Ninjas in Pyjamas on left ·
Apeks on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.