T2
BO3
CSGO
2020-03-07
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | GODSENT | vs | Copenhagen Flames | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
60% (18/30) |
|
0% (0/4) | +60pp |
overpass
|
45% (10/22) |
|
100% (4/4) | -55pp |
vertigo
|
44% (7/16) |
|
22% (2/9) | +22pp |
nuke
|
33% (6/18) |
|
50% (2/4) | -17pp |
ancient
|
54% (20/37) |
|
67% (4/6) | -13pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
50% (1/2) | -10pp |
mirage
|
47% (14/30) | · | — | |
dust2
|
0% (0/1) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
GODSENT bans
nuke
33% WR
vertigo
44% WR
Copenhagen Flames bans
inferno
0% WR
ancient
67% WR
GODSENT pick
overpass
31% — GODSENT favored
Decider
anubis
56% Copenhagen Flames
Decider
mirage
Copenhagen Flames pick
dust2
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
GODSENT
overpass
Copenhagen Flames
vertigo
GODSENT
nuke
Copenhagen Flames
ancient
Copenhagen Flames
anubis
Copenhagen Flames
GODSENT on left ·
Copenhagen Flames on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.