CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Sharks | vs | Imperial | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
64% (82/128) |
|
31% (5/16) | +33pp |
overpass
|
42% (10/24) |
|
66% (40/61) | -24pp |
mirage
|
50% (66/133) |
|
66% (89/134) | -16pp |
dust2
|
75% (6/8) |
|
67% (58/87) | +8pp |
anubis
|
70% (81/116) |
|
64% (47/74) | +6pp |
nuke
|
57% (114/199) |
|
61% (87/142) | -4pp |
vertigo
|
55% (42/77) |
|
51% (20/39) | +4pp |
inferno
|
56% (67/120) |
|
56% (67/119) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Sharks bans
overpass
42% WR
mirage
50% WR
Imperial bans
ancient
31% WR
vertigo
51% WR
Sharks pick
dust2
53% — Sharks favored
Decider
nuke
52% Imperial
Decider
inferno
50% Sharks
Imperial pick
anubis
48% — Imperial favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Sharks
overpass
Imperial
mirage
Imperial
dust2
even
anubis
even
nuke
even
vertigo
even
inferno
even
Sharks on left ·
Imperial on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.