T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-02-26
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | TYLOO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
73% (19/26) |
|
0% (0/1) | +73pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
67% (36/54) | -27pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
70% (57/82) | -20pp |
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
50% (37/74) | +18pp |
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
56% (60/108) | +16pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
51% (20/39) | +16pp |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) |
|
55% (6/11) | -5pp |
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
60% (40/67) | +2pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
mirage
50% WR
TYLOO bans
ancient
50% WR
overpass
51% WR
100 Thieves pick
inferno
56% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
vertigo
52% TYLOO
Decider
dust2
100% 100 Thieves
TYLOO pick
nuke
49% — TYLOO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100 Thieves
anubis
TYLOO
mirage
TYLOO
ancient
100 Thieves
inferno
100 Thieves
overpass
100 Thieves
vertigo
even
nuke
even
100 Thieves on left ·
TYLOO on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.