CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | ENCE | vs | MIBR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
18% (3/17) |
|
66% (63/96) | -48pp |
dust2
|
60% (53/88) |
|
38% (3/8) | +22pp |
ancient
|
54% (73/136) |
|
65% (72/111) | -11pp |
vertigo
|
67% (33/49) |
|
60% (49/82) | +7pp |
anubis
|
57% (50/88) |
|
63% (69/109) | -6pp |
mirage
|
49% (51/104) |
|
47% (43/91) | +2pp |
nuke
|
57% (67/118) |
|
59% (72/122) | -2pp |
overpass
|
47% (21/45) |
|
47% (14/30) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
ENCE bans
inferno
18% WR
overpass
47% WR
MIBR bans
dust2
38% WR
mirage
47% WR
ENCE pick
vertigo
53% — ENCE favored
Decider
nuke
51% MIBR
Decider
anubis
52% MIBR
MIBR pick
ancient
55% — MIBR favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
MIBR
dust2
ENCE
ancient
MIBR
vertigo
even
anubis
even
mirage
even
nuke
even
overpass
even
ENCE on left ·
MIBR on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.