T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-02-15
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | Evil Geniuses | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
73% (19/26) |
|
25% (1/4) | +48pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
31% (8/26) | +36pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
17% (1/6) | +23pp |
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
50% (13/26) | +18pp |
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
48% (13/27) | +14pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
61% (22/36) | -11pp |
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
64% (21/33) | +8pp |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) |
|
47% (7/15) | +3pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
mirage
50% WR
Evil Geniuses bans
dust2
25% WR
overpass
31% WR
100 Thieves pick
inferno
53% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
vertigo
52% 100 Thieves
Decider
nuke
56% 100 Thieves
Evil Geniuses pick
ancient
42% — Evil Geniuses favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100 Thieves
overpass
100 Thieves
anubis
100 Thieves
ancient
100 Thieves
nuke
100 Thieves
mirage
Evil Geniuses
inferno
even
vertigo
even
100 Thieves on left ·
Evil Geniuses on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.