T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-02-14
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | G2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
40% (2/5) |
|
54% (28/52) | -14pp |
|
|
67% (2/3) |
|
54% (13/24) | +13pp |
|
|
73% (19/26) |
|
61% (43/70) | +12pp |
|
|
72% (18/25) |
|
63% (74/117) | +9pp |
|
|
50% (7/14) |
|
58% (49/84) | -8pp |
|
|
68% (15/22) |
|
62% (55/89) | +6pp |
|
|
50% (5/10) |
|
55% (16/29) | -5pp |
|
|
62% (15/24) |
|
62% (44/71) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
G2 bans
100 Thieves pick
54% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
52% 100 Thieves
Decider
50% 100 Thieves
G2 pick
47% — G2 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
G2
100 Thieves
even
even
even
even
even
even
100 Thieves on left ·
G2 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.