T1 BO3 CSGO 2020-02-14
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map 100 Thieves vs G2 Edge
anubis
40% (2/5)
54% (28/52) -14pp
overpass
67% (2/3)
54% (13/24) +13pp
dust2
73% (19/26)
61% (43/70) +12pp
inferno
72% (18/25)
63% (74/117) +9pp
mirage
50% (7/14)
58% (49/84) -8pp
ancient
68% (15/22)
62% (55/89) +6pp
vertigo
50% (5/10)
55% (16/29) -5pp
nuke
62% (15/24)
62% (44/71) 0pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis 40% WR
mirage 50% WR
G2 bans
overpass 54% WR
vertigo 55% WR
100 Thieves pick
dust2
54% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
ancient
52% 100 Thieves
Decider
nuke
50% 100 Thieves
G2 pick
inferno
47% — G2 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
43%
57%
G2
overpass
55%
45%
100 Thieves
dust2
54%
46%
even
inferno
53%
47%
even
mirage
46%
54%
even
ancient
52%
48%
even
vertigo
48%
52%
even
nuke
50%
50%
even
100 Thieves on left · G2 on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.