CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Liquid | vs | MIBR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
vertigo
|
25% (4/16) |
|
60% (49/82) | -35pp |
nuke
|
46% (38/82) |
|
59% (72/122) | -13pp |
inferno
|
55% (56/102) |
|
66% (63/96) | -11pp |
mirage
|
56% (49/87) |
|
47% (43/91) | +9pp |
dust2
|
47% (28/60) |
|
38% (3/8) | +9pp |
overpass
|
53% (19/36) |
|
47% (14/30) | +6pp |
ancient
|
62% (53/86) |
|
65% (72/111) | -3pp |
anubis
|
61% (39/64) |
|
63% (69/109) | -2pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Liquid bans
vertigo
25% WR
nuke
46% WR
MIBR bans
dust2
38% WR
mirage
47% WR
Liquid pick
ancient
49% — Liquid favored
Decider
overpass
53% Liquid
Decider
anubis
51% MIBR
MIBR pick
inferno
55% — MIBR favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
MIBR
nuke
MIBR
inferno
MIBR
mirage
even
dust2
Liquid
overpass
even
ancient
even
anubis
even
Liquid on left ·
MIBR on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.