T2
BO3
CSGO
2020-01-19
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Complexity | vs | INTZ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
40% (25/62) |
|
83% (5/6) | -43pp |
nuke
|
39% (22/57) |
|
25% (2/8) | +14pp |
inferno
|
39% (22/56) |
|
25% (3/12) | +14pp |
mirage
|
50% (4/8) |
|
38% (3/8) | +12pp |
anubis
|
57% (39/68) |
|
55% (6/11) | +2pp |
dust2
|
26% (6/23) | · | — | |
overpass
|
63% (33/52) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
62% (26/42) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Complexity bans
nuke
39% WR
ancient
40% WR
INTZ bans
inferno
25% WR
mirage
38% WR
Complexity pick
anubis
51% — Complexity favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
dust2
INTZ pick
overpass
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
INTZ
nuke
Complexity
inferno
Complexity
mirage
Complexity
anubis
even
Complexity on left ·
INTZ on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.