T2 BO3 CSGO 2020-01-19
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map GODSENT vs HAVU Edge
dust2
0% (0/1)
40% (17/43) -40pp
inferno
60% (18/30)
37% (14/38) +23pp
mirage
47% (14/30)
28% (16/58) +19pp
nuke
33% (6/18)
51% (50/99) -18pp
ancient
54% (20/37)
38% (21/56) +16pp
overpass
45% (10/22)
36% (12/33) +9pp
vertigo
44% (7/16)
47% (7/15) -3pp
anubis
40% (2/5)
39% (12/31) +1pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
GODSENT bans
nuke 33% WR
anubis 40% WR
HAVU bans
mirage 28% WR
overpass 36% WR
GODSENT pick
inferno
62% — GODSENT favored
Decider
ancient
59% GODSENT
Decider
dust2
100% HAVU
HAVU pick
vertigo
52% — HAVU favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
0%
100%
HAVU
inferno
62%
38%
GODSENT
mirage
63%
37%
GODSENT
nuke
39%
61%
HAVU
ancient
59%
41%
GODSENT
overpass
56%
44%
GODSENT
vertigo
48%
52%
even
anubis
51%
49%
even
GODSENT on left · HAVU on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.