CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Cloud9 | vs | INTZ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
53% (35/66) |
|
83% (5/6) | -30pp |
inferno
|
52% (26/50) |
|
25% (3/12) | +27pp |
mirage
|
57% (31/54) |
|
38% (3/8) | +19pp |
anubis
|
62% (30/48) |
|
55% (6/11) | +7pp |
nuke
|
31% (5/16) |
|
25% (2/8) | +6pp |
dust2
|
52% (11/21) | · | — | |
overpass
|
59% (23/39) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
64% (23/36) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Cloud9 bans
nuke
31% WR
ancient
53% WR
INTZ bans
inferno
25% WR
mirage
38% WR
Cloud9 pick
anubis
53% — Cloud9 favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
dust2
INTZ pick
overpass
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
INTZ
inferno
Cloud9
mirage
Cloud9
anubis
even
nuke
Cloud9
Cloud9 on left ·
INTZ on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.