T1
BO3
CSGO
2020-01-08
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Complexity | vs | Chaos | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
40% (25/62) |
|
0% (0/1) | +40pp |
inferno
|
39% (22/56) |
|
60% (3/5) | -21pp |
dust2
|
26% (6/23) |
|
10% (1/10) | +16pp |
nuke
|
39% (22/57) |
|
50% (5/10) | -11pp |
overpass
|
63% (33/52) |
|
67% (2/3) | -4pp |
mirage
|
50% (4/8) |
|
50% (4/8) | 0pp |
anubis
|
57% (39/68) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
62% (26/42) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Complexity bans
dust2
26% WR
inferno
39% WR
Chaos bans
nuke
50% WR
mirage
50% WR
Complexity pick
overpass
48% — Complexity favored
Decider
ancient
100% Complexity
Decider
anubis
Chaos pick
vertigo
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Complexity
inferno
Chaos
dust2
Complexity
nuke
Chaos
overpass
even
mirage
even
Complexity on left ·
Chaos on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.