T1
BO3
CSGO
2019-12-04
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | FaZe | vs | 100 Thieves | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
42% (21/50) |
|
67% (2/3) | -25pp |
|
|
52% (33/64) |
|
73% (19/26) | -21pp |
|
|
57% (50/88) |
|
72% (18/25) | -15pp |
|
|
51% (27/53) |
|
40% (2/5) | +11pp |
|
|
57% (63/110) |
|
50% (7/14) | +7pp |
|
|
44% (4/9) |
|
50% (5/10) | -6pp |
|
|
64% (69/108) |
|
68% (15/22) | -4pp |
|
|
62% (72/116) |
|
62% (15/24) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
FaZe bans
100 Thieves bans
FaZe pick
48% — FaZe favored
Decider
56% 100 Thieves
Decider
50% FaZe
100 Thieves pick
58% — 100 Thieves favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
100 Thieves
100 Thieves
100 Thieves
FaZe
even
even
even
even
FaZe on left ·
100 Thieves on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.