T2
BO3
CSGO
2019-11-16
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Chaos | vs | Virtus.pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
0% (0/1) |
|
52% (42/81) | -52pp |
nuke
|
50% (5/10) |
|
100% (2/2) | -50pp |
dust2
|
10% (1/10) |
|
50% (27/54) | -40pp |
inferno
|
60% (3/5) |
|
64% (43/67) | -4pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
70% (37/53) | -3pp |
mirage
|
50% (4/8) |
|
50% (36/72) | 0pp |
anubis
|
— | · | 50% (19/38) | |
vertigo
|
— | · | 43% (15/35) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Chaos bans
dust2
10% WR
inferno
60% WR
Virtus.pro bans
mirage
50% WR
overpass
70% WR
Chaos pick
vertigo
Decider
nuke
67% Virtus.pro
Decider
anubis
Virtus.pro pick
ancient
100% — Virtus.pro favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Virtus.pro
nuke
Virtus.pro
dust2
Virtus.pro
inferno
even
overpass
even
mirage
even
Chaos on left ·
Virtus.pro on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.