T1
BO3
CSGO
2019-11-08
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | ENCE | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
18% (3/17) | +54pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
47% (21/45) | +20pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
57% (50/88) | -17pp |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) |
|
67% (33/49) | -17pp |
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
54% (73/136) | +14pp |
dust2
|
73% (19/26) |
|
60% (53/88) | +13pp |
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
57% (67/118) | +5pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
49% (51/104) | +1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
vertigo
50% WR
ENCE bans
inferno
18% WR
overpass
47% WR
100 Thieves pick
dust2
55% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
ancient
56% 100 Thieves
Decider
mirage
51% 100 Thieves
ENCE pick
nuke
48% — ENCE favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
100 Thieves
overpass
100 Thieves
anubis
ENCE
vertigo
ENCE
ancient
100 Thieves
dust2
100 Thieves
nuke
even
mirage
even
100 Thieves on left ·
ENCE on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.