T2
BO3
CSGO
2019-10-26
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Copenhagen Flames | vs | Apeks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
0% (0/4) |
|
59% (26/44) | -59pp |
overpass
|
100% (4/4) |
|
47% (17/36) | +53pp |
nuke
|
50% (2/4) |
|
0% (0/1) | +50pp |
vertigo
|
22% (2/9) |
|
50% (13/26) | -28pp |
ancient
|
67% (4/6) |
|
55% (35/64) | +12pp |
anubis
|
50% (1/2) |
|
59% (24/41) | -9pp |
mirage
|
— | · | 41% (20/49) | |
dust2
|
— | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Copenhagen Flames bans
inferno
0% WR
vertigo
22% WR
Apeks bans
overpass
47% WR
ancient
55% WR
Copenhagen Flames pick
mirage
Decider
nuke
100% Copenhagen Flames
Decider
anubis
54% Apeks
Apeks pick
dust2
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
Apeks
overpass
Copenhagen Flames
nuke
Copenhagen Flames
vertigo
Apeks
ancient
Copenhagen Flames
anubis
even
Copenhagen Flames on left ·
Apeks on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.